lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aHQsxMkvvyvJvHrh@pop-os.localdomain>
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2025 15:01:40 -0700
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: jhs@...atatu.com, will@...lsroot.io, stephen@...workplumber.org,
	Savino Dicanosa <savy@...t3mfailure.io>
Subject: Re: [Patch v3 net 1/4] net_sched: Implement the right netem
 duplication behavior

On Sun, Jul 13, 2025 at 02:47:45PM -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> I tested netem packet duplication in two configurations:
> 1. Nest netem-to-netem hierarchy using parent/child attachment
> 2. Single netem using prio qdisc with netem leaf
> 

Below is the complete tcpdump output I had for each of the above setup,
just provide more evidence here since a lot of people don't trust me.

(Don't get me wrong, it is obviously my fault of not being able to gain
trust).


[root@...alhost ~]# tcpdump -i lo -nn -c 20 icmp
[  589.079074] lo: entered promiscuous mode
dropped privs to tcpdump
tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v[v]... for full protocol decode
listening on lo, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), snapshot length 262144 bytes
12:59:23.485638 IP 127.0.0.1 > 127.0.0.1: ICMP echo request, id 5, seq 1, length 64
12:59:23.485844 IP 127.0.0.1 > 127.0.0.1: ICMP echo request, id 5, seq 1, length 64
12:59:23.486714 IP 127.0.0.1 > 127.0.0.1: ICMP echo reply, id 5, seq 1, length 64
12:59:23.486996 IP 127.0.0.1 > 127.0.0.1: ICMP echo reply, id 5, seq 1, length 64
12:59:23.487867 IP 127.0.0.1 > 127.0.0.1: ICMP echo reply, id 5, seq 1, length 64
12:59:23.488163 IP 127.0.0.1 > 127.0.0.1: ICMP echo reply, id 5, seq 1, length 64


[root@...alhost ~]# tcpdump -i lo -nn -c 20 icmp
[  361.831773] lo: entered promiscuous mode
dropped privs to tcpdump
tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v[v]... for full protocol decode
listening on lo, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), snapshot length 262144 bytes
12:55:37.074400 IP 127.0.0.1 > 127.0.0.1: ICMP echo request, id 3, seq 1, length 64
12:55:37.074606 IP 127.0.0.1 > 127.0.0.1: ICMP echo request, id 3, seq 1, length 64
12:55:37.074806 IP 127.0.0.1 > 127.0.0.1: ICMP echo request, id 3, seq 1, length 64
12:55:37.075012 IP 127.0.0.1 > 127.0.0.1: ICMP echo request, id 3, seq 1, length 64
12:55:37.076508 IP 127.0.0.1 > 127.0.0.1: ICMP echo reply, id 3, seq 1, length 64
12:55:37.076789 IP 127.0.0.1 > 127.0.0.1: ICMP echo reply, id 3, seq 1, length 64
12:55:37.077069 IP 127.0.0.1 > 127.0.0.1: ICMP echo reply, id 3, seq 1, length 64
12:55:37.077404 IP 127.0.0.1 > 127.0.0.1: ICMP echo reply, id 3, seq 1, length 64
12:55:37.078825 IP 127.0.0.1 > 127.0.0.1: ICMP echo reply, id 3, seq 1, length 64
12:55:37.079109 IP 127.0.0.1 > 127.0.0.1: ICMP echo reply, id 3, seq 1, length 64
12:55:37.079404 IP 127.0.0.1 > 127.0.0.1: ICMP echo reply, id 3, seq 1, length 64
12:55:37.079927 IP 127.0.0.1 > 127.0.0.1: ICMP echo reply, id 3, seq 1, length 64
12:55:37.081125 IP 127.0.0.1 > 127.0.0.1: ICMP echo reply, id 3, seq 1, length 64
12:55:37.081477 IP 127.0.0.1 > 127.0.0.1: ICMP echo reply, id 3, seq 1, length 64
12:55:37.081763 IP 127.0.0.1 > 127.0.0.1: ICMP echo reply, id 3, seq 1, length 64
12:55:37.082044 IP 127.0.0.1 > 127.0.0.1: ICMP echo reply, id 3, seq 1, length 64
12:55:37.083253 IP 127.0.0.1 > 127.0.0.1: ICMP echo reply, id 3, seq 1, length 64
12:55:37.083534 IP 127.0.0.1 > 127.0.0.1: ICMP echo reply, id 3, seq 1, length 64
12:55:37.083816 IP 127.0.0.1 > 127.0.0.1: ICMP echo reply, id 3, seq 1, length 64
12:55:37.084101 IP 127.0.0.1 > 127.0.0.1: ICMP echo reply, id 3, seq 1, length 64
20 packets captured
40 packets received by filter


I didn't include them because the patch description is already very
long. I am happy to add them to the patch description on request.

Please let me know if I miss anything here. I am very very open to
continue iterating this patch.

Thanks!

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ