[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <268f6849-efc6-4663-af20-f6726bd4b78d@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 14:50:05 +0530
From: "Malladi, Meghana" <m-malladi@...com>
To: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>,
Siddharth Vadapalli
<s-vadapalli@...com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski
<kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Alexei Starovoitov
<ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard
Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Sumit
Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
Christian König
<christian.koenig@....com>
CC: <srk@...com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 0/5] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw: add AF_XDP
zero copy support
Hi Roger,
On 5/20/2025 3:53 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
> This series adds AF_XDP zero coppy support to am65-cpsw driver.
>
> Tests were performed on AM62x-sk with xdpsock application [1].
>
> A clear improvement is seen in 64 byte packets on Transmit (txonly)
> and receive (rxdrop).
> 1500 byte test seems to be limited by line rate (1G link) so no
> improvement seen there in packet rate. A test on higher speed link
> (or PHY-less setup) might be worthwile.
>
> There is some issue during l2fwd with 64 byte packets and benchmark
> results show 0. I'm still investigating this issue.
>
> AF_XDP performance using 64 byte packets in Kpps.
> Benchmark: XDP-SKB XDP-Native XDP-Native(ZeroCopy)
> rxdrop 317 504 824
> txonly 400 405 757
> l2fwd 207 264 0
>
> AF_XDP performance using 1500 byte packets in Kpps.
> Benchmark: XDP-SKB XDP-Native XDP-Native(ZeroCopy)
> rxdrop 82 82 82
> txonly 82 82 82
> l2fwd 82 82 82
>
> [1]: https://github.com/xdp-project/bpf-examples/tree/master/AF_XDP-example
>
> To:
>
> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>
This series crashes Linux on am64xx-hsevm, when I tried nfs boot using
AM65-CPSW-NUSS driver:
logs:
https://gist.github.com/MeghanaMalladiTI/d655a1c8ca88113ee7f5f57d6ab0ec4c
Seems like you have reverted the fix for the same bug which was reported
by Siddharth and fixed by Julien:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/7f7fb71a-6d15-46f1-b63c-b569a2e230b7@baylibre.com/
reverted lines:
if (!common->ports[port].ndev)
/* FIXME should we BUG here? */
continue;
Can you please take a look at it.
> ---
> Roger Quadros (5):
> net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw: fix BPF Program change on multi-port CPSW
> net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw: add XSK pool helpers
> net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw: Add AF_XDP zero copy for RX
> net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw: Add AF_XDP zero copy for TX
> net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw: enable zero copy in XDP features
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/ti/Makefile | 2 +-
> drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.c | 526 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.h | 37 ++-
> drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-xdp.c | 155 +++++++++
> 4 files changed, 656 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
> ---
> base-commit: 9f607dc39b6658ba8ea647bd99725e68c66071b7
> change-id: 20250225-am65-cpsw-xdp-zc-2af9e4be1356
>
> Best regards,
--
Thanks,
Meghana Malladi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists