[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bbdbe42b-614c-4f66-8712-f0ab8d54b490@molgen.mpg.de>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 16:15:51 +0200
From: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>
To: Pauli Virtanen <pav@....fi>
Cc: linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, marcel@...tmann.org,
johan.hedberg@...il.com, luiz.dentz@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, horms@...nel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: ISO: add socket option to report packet seqnum
via CMSG
Dear Pauli,
Thank you for your patch.
Am 14.07.25 um 16:02 schrieb Pauli Virtanen:
> User applications need a way to track which ISO interval a given SDU
> belongs to, to properly detect packet loss. All controllers do not set
> timestamps, and it's not guaranteed user application receives all packet
> reports (small socket buffer, or controller doesn't send all reports
> like Intel AX210 is doing).
>
> Add socket option BT_PKT_SEQNUM that enables reporting of received
> packet ISO sequence number in BT_SCM_PKT_SEQNUM CMSG.
Are there user applications already supporting this, so it can be tested?
> Signed-off-by: Pauli Virtanen <pav@....fi>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> Intel AX210 is not sending all reports:
>
> $ btmon -r dump.btsnoop -I -C90|grep -A1 'ISO Data RX: Handle 2304'
> ...
> > ISO Data RX: Handle 2304 flags 0x02 dlen 64 #1713 [hci0] 22.567744
> dd 01 3c 00 6d 08 e9 14 1e 3b 85 7b 35 c2 25 0b ..<.m....;.{5.%.
> --
> > ISO Data RX: Handle 2304 flags 0x02 dlen 64 #1718 [hci0] 22.573745
> de 01 3c 00 41 65 22 4f 99 9b 0b b6 ff cb 06 00 ..<.Ae"O........
> --
> > ISO Data RX: Handle 2304 flags 0x02 dlen 64 #1727 [hci0] 22.587933
> e0 01 3c 00 8b 6e 33 44 65 51 ee d7 e0 ee 49 d8 ..<..n3DeQ....I.
> --
> > ISO Data RX: Handle 2304 flags 0x02 dlen 64 #1732 [hci0] 22.596742
> e1 01 3c 00 a7 48 54 a7 c1 9f dc 37 66 fe 04 ab ..<..HT....7f...
> ...
>
> Here, report for packet with sequence number 0x01df is missing.
Sorry, but where are the sequence number in the trace?
>
> This may be spec violation by the controller, see Core v6.1 pp. 3702
>
> All SDUs shall be sent to the upper layer including the indication
> of validity of data. A report shall be sent to the upper layer if
> the SDU is completely missing.
>
> Regardless, it will be easier for user applications to see the HW
> sequence numbers directly, so they don't have to count packets and it's
> in any case more reliable if packets get dropped due to socket buffer
> size.
I wouldn’t mind to have the note in the commit message.
> include/net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h | 9 ++++++++-
> net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.c | 7 +++++++
> net/bluetooth/iso.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++---
> 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h b/include/net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h
> index 114299bd8b98..0e31779a3341 100644
> --- a/include/net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h
> +++ b/include/net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h
> @@ -244,6 +244,10 @@ struct bt_codecs {
>
> #define BT_ISO_BASE 20
>
> +#define BT_PKT_SEQNUM 21
> +
> +#define BT_SCM_PKT_SEQNUM 0x05
> +
> __printf(1, 2)
> void bt_info(const char *fmt, ...);
> __printf(1, 2)
> @@ -391,7 +395,8 @@ struct bt_sock {
> enum {
> BT_SK_DEFER_SETUP,
> BT_SK_SUSPEND,
> - BT_SK_PKT_STATUS
> + BT_SK_PKT_STATUS,
> + BT_SK_PKT_SEQNUM,
> };
>
> struct bt_sock_list {
> @@ -475,6 +480,7 @@ struct bt_skb_cb {
> u8 pkt_type;
> u8 force_active;
> u16 expect;
> + u16 pkt_seqnum;
Excuse my ignorance, just want to make sure, the type is big enough.
> u8 incoming:1;
> u8 pkt_status:2;
> union {
> @@ -488,6 +494,7 @@ struct bt_skb_cb {
>
> #define hci_skb_pkt_type(skb) bt_cb((skb))->pkt_type
> #define hci_skb_pkt_status(skb) bt_cb((skb))->pkt_status
> +#define hci_skb_pkt_seqnum(skb) bt_cb((skb))->pkt_seqnum
> #define hci_skb_expect(skb) bt_cb((skb))->expect
> #define hci_skb_opcode(skb) bt_cb((skb))->hci.opcode
> #define hci_skb_event(skb) bt_cb((skb))->hci.req_event
> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.c b/net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.c
> index 6ad2f72f53f4..44b7acb20a67 100644
> --- a/net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.c
> +++ b/net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.c
> @@ -364,6 +364,13 @@ int bt_sock_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
> put_cmsg(msg, SOL_BLUETOOTH, BT_SCM_PKT_STATUS,
> sizeof(pkt_status), &pkt_status);
> }
> +
> + if (test_bit(BT_SK_PKT_SEQNUM, &bt_sk(sk)->flags)) {
> + u16 pkt_seqnum = hci_skb_pkt_seqnum(skb);
> +
> + put_cmsg(msg, SOL_BLUETOOTH, BT_SCM_PKT_SEQNUM,
> + sizeof(pkt_seqnum), &pkt_seqnum);
> + }
> }
>
> skb_free_datagram(sk, skb);
> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/iso.c b/net/bluetooth/iso.c
> index fc22782cbeeb..469450bb6b6c 100644
> --- a/net/bluetooth/iso.c
> +++ b/net/bluetooth/iso.c
> @@ -1687,6 +1687,17 @@ static int iso_sock_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
> clear_bit(BT_SK_PKT_STATUS, &bt_sk(sk)->flags);
> break;
>
> + case BT_PKT_SEQNUM:
> + err = copy_safe_from_sockptr(&opt, sizeof(opt), optval, optlen);
> + if (err)
> + break;
> +
> + if (opt)
> + set_bit(BT_SK_PKT_SEQNUM, &bt_sk(sk)->flags);
> + else
> + clear_bit(BT_SK_PKT_SEQNUM, &bt_sk(sk)->flags);
> + break;
> +
> case BT_ISO_QOS:
> if (sk->sk_state != BT_OPEN && sk->sk_state != BT_BOUND &&
> sk->sk_state != BT_CONNECT2 &&
> @@ -2278,7 +2289,7 @@ static void iso_disconn_cfm(struct hci_conn *hcon, __u8 reason)
> void iso_recv(struct hci_conn *hcon, struct sk_buff *skb, u16 flags)
> {
> struct iso_conn *conn = hcon->iso_data;
> - __u16 pb, ts, len;
> + __u16 pb, ts, len, sn;
Use `seqnum` for consistency with the parts above.
>
> if (!conn)
> goto drop;
> @@ -2308,6 +2319,7 @@ void iso_recv(struct hci_conn *hcon, struct sk_buff *skb, u16 flags)
> goto drop;
> }
>
> + sn = hdr->sn;
> len = __le16_to_cpu(hdr->slen);
> } else {
> struct hci_iso_data_hdr *hdr;
> @@ -2318,18 +2330,20 @@ void iso_recv(struct hci_conn *hcon, struct sk_buff *skb, u16 flags)
> goto drop;
> }
>
> + sn = hdr->sn;
> len = __le16_to_cpu(hdr->slen);
> }
>
> flags = hci_iso_data_flags(len);
> len = hci_iso_data_len(len);
>
> - BT_DBG("Start: total len %d, frag len %d flags 0x%4.4x", len,
> - skb->len, flags);
> + BT_DBG("Start: total len %d, frag len %d flags 0x%4.4x sn %d",
> + len, skb->len, flags, sn);
>
> if (len == skb->len) {
> /* Complete frame received */
> hci_skb_pkt_status(skb) = flags & 0x03;
> + hci_skb_pkt_seqnum(skb) = sn;
> iso_recv_frame(conn, skb);
> return;
> }
> @@ -2352,6 +2366,7 @@ void iso_recv(struct hci_conn *hcon, struct sk_buff *skb, u16 flags)
> goto drop;
>
> hci_skb_pkt_status(conn->rx_skb) = flags & 0x03;
> + hci_skb_pkt_seqnum(conn->rx_skb) = sn;
> skb_copy_from_linear_data(skb, skb_put(conn->rx_skb, skb->len),
> skb->len);
> conn->rx_len = len - skb->len;
Kind regards,
Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists