lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6a599379-1eb5-41c2-84fc-eb6fde36d3ba@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 12:14:34 +0200
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@...nel.org>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>,
 Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 eric.dumazet@...il.com, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/8] tcp: receiver changes

On 7/15/25 11:21 AM, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
> On 15/07/2025 10:25, Paolo Abeni wrote:
>> @Matttbe: can you reproduce the flakes locally? if so, does reverting
>> that series stop them? (not that I'm planning a revert, just to validate
>> my guess).
> 
> I'm trying to reproduce this locally on top of net-next, no luck so far.
> I will also continue to monitor the MPTCP CI.
> 
> For the moment, I don't think it might be linked to this series: 

Agreed. I did not notice the pending mptcp patches, which are a more
relevant suspect here.

> Eventually, because the failure is due to a poll timed out, and other
> unrelated tests have failed at that time too, could it be due to
> overloaded test machines?

Not for a 60s timeout, I guess :-P

/P



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ