[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9bed2f6e-6251-4d0c-ad1e-f1b8625a0a10@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 11:37:45 +0100
From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
To: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>, Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com>
Cc: willy@...radead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, kernel_team@...ynix.com,
ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org, harry.yoo@...cle.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, toke@...hat.com,
david@...hat.com, Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, vbabka@...e.cz, rppt@...nel.org,
surenb@...gle.com, mhocko@...e.com, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, vishal.moola@...il.com, hannes@...xchg.org,
ziy@...dia.com, jackmanb@...gle.com, wei.fang@....com, shenwei.wang@....com,
xiaoning.wang@....com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com,
przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com, sgoutham@...vell.com, gakula@...vell.com,
sbhatta@...vell.com, hkelam@...vell.com, bbhushan2@...vell.com,
tariqt@...dia.com, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, hawk@...nel.org,
john.fastabend@...il.com, sdf@...ichev.me, saeedm@...dia.com,
leon@...nel.org, mbloch@...dia.com, danishanwar@...com, rogerq@...nel.org,
nbd@....name, lorenzo@...nel.org, ryder.lee@...iatek.com,
shayne.chen@...iatek.com, sean.wang@...iatek.com, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com, aleksander.lobakin@...el.com,
horms@...nel.org, m-malladi@...com, krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org,
matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com, robh@...nel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v10 02/12] netmem: use netmem_desc instead of
page to access ->pp in __netmem_get_pp()
On 7/14/25 20:37, Mina Almasry wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 5:01 AM Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com> wrote:
...>> +static inline struct netmem_desc *pp_page_to_nmdesc(struct page *page)
>> +{
>> + DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE(!page_pool_page_is_pp(page));
>> +
>> + /* XXX: How to extract netmem_desc from page must be changed,
>> + * once netmem_desc no longer overlays on page and will be
>> + * allocated through slab.
>> + */
>> + return (struct netmem_desc *)page;
>> +}
>> +
>
> Same thing. Do not create a generic looking pp_page_to_nmdesc helper
> which does not check that the page is the correct type. The
> DEBUG_NET... is not good enough.
>
> You don't need to add a generic helper here. There is only one call
> site. Open code this in the callsite. The one callsite is marked as
> unsafe, only called by code that knows that the netmem is specifically
> a pp page. Open code this in the unsafe callsite, instead of creating
> a generic looking unsafe helper and not even documenting it's unsafe.
>
>> /**
>> * __netmem_get_pp - unsafely get pointer to the &page_pool backing @netmem
>> * @netmem: netmem reference to get the pointer from
>> @@ -280,7 +291,7 @@ static inline struct net_iov *__netmem_clear_lsb(netmem_ref netmem)
>> */
>> static inline struct page_pool *__netmem_get_pp(netmem_ref netmem)
>> {
>> - return __netmem_to_page(netmem)->pp;
>> + return pp_page_to_nmdesc(__netmem_to_page(netmem))->pp;
>> }
>
> This makes me very sad. Casting from netmem -> page -> nmdesc...
The function is not used, and I don't think the series adds any
new users? It can be killed then. It's a horrible function anyway,
would be much better to have a variant taking struct page * if
necessary.
> Instead, we should be able to go from netmem directly to nmdesc. I
> would suggest rename __netmem_clear_lsb to netmem_to_nmdesc and have
> it return netmem_desc instead of net_iov. Then use it here.
Glad you liked the diff I suggested :) In either case, seems
like it's not strictly necessary for this iteration as
__netmem_get_pp() should be killed, and the rest of patches work
directly with pages.
> We could have an unsafe version of netmem_to_nmdesc which converts the
> netmem to netmem_desc without clearing the lsb and mark it unsafe.
>
--
Pavel Begunkov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists