[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bd47870b-e266-4b1b-a806-b8db1b06e1d4@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 15:50:08 +0200
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
Cc: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@...nel.org>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/8] tcp: receiver changes
On 7/15/25 3:28 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jul 2025 12:14:34 +0200 Paolo Abeni wrote:
>>> Eventually, because the failure is due to a poll timed out, and other
>>> unrelated tests have failed at that time too, could it be due to
>>> overloaded test machines?
>>
>> Not for a 60s timeout, I guess :-P
FTR, the above was referred to the mptcp selftest failure/timeout.
/P
Powered by blists - more mailing lists