[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<PAXPR04MB85104B281581D95FDAFE59D98850A@PAXPR04MB8510.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2025 02:08:28 +0000
From: Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>
To: Frank Li <frank.li@....com>
CC: "robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>, "krzk+dt@...nel.org"
<krzk+dt@...nel.org>, "conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"richardcochran@...il.com" <richardcochran@...il.com>, Claudiu Manoil
<claudiu.manoil@....com>, Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>, Clark
Wang <xiaoning.wang@....com>, "andrew+netdev@...n.ch"
<andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>, "kuba@...nel.org"
<kuba@...nel.org>, "pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev" <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>, "s.hauer@...gutronix.de"
<s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, "festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>, "F.S.
Peng" <fushi.peng@....com>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org"
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 net-next 04/14] ptp: netc: add PTP_CLK_REQ_PPS support
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 11:59:30AM +0000, Wei Fang wrote:
> > > > +static u32 netc_timer_calculate_fiper_pw(struct netc_timer *priv,
> > > > + u32 fiper)
> > > > +{
> > > > + u64 divisor, pulse_width;
> > > > +
> > > > + /* Set the FIPER pulse width to half FIPER interval by default.
> > > > + * pulse_width = (fiper / 2) / TMR_GCLK_period,
> > > > + * TMR_GCLK_period = NSEC_PER_SEC / TMR_GCLK_freq,
> > > > + * TMR_GCLK_freq = (clk_freq / oclk_prsc) Hz,
> > > > + * so pulse_width = fiper * clk_freq / (2 * NSEC_PER_SEC * oclk_prsc).
> > > > + */
> > > > + divisor = mul_u32_u32(2000000000U, priv->oclk_prsc);
> > >
> > > is it 2*PSEC_PER_SEC ?
> > >
> >
> > No, it is 2 * NSEC_PER_SEC, NSEC_PER_SEC is 1000000000.
>
> Use 2 * NSEC_PER_SEC, instead of hardcode number.
>
Sure, thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists