netdev - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: net: Convert Marvell Armada NETA and BM to DT schema

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAL_JsqLUuMV7RNqziCPrxnXVN+m3LhjqTk2kBEEEwtdWzV6+SA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2025 21:18:13 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, 
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Marcin Wojtas <marcin.s.wojtas@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: net: Convert Marvell Armada NETA and BM to
 DT schema

On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 3:46 AM Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On 7/3/25 12:26 AM, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml
> > index 5d2a7a8d3ac6..741b545e3ab0 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml
> > @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ patternProperties:
> >    "^(pciclass|pinctrl-single|#pinctrl-single|PowerPC),.*": true
> >    "^(pl022|pxa-mmc|rcar_sound|rotary-encoder|s5m8767|sdhci),.*": true
> >    "^(simple-audio-card|st-plgpio|st-spics|ts),.*": true
> > +  "^pool[0-3],.*": true
>
> The 'DO NOT ADD NEW PROPERTIES TO THIS LIST' comment just above this
> block is a bit scaring, even if the list has been indeed updated a few
> times. @Rob: can you please confirm this chunk is intended?

Yes, it is intended. It's not new properties. It's properties added to
the schemas which I suppose I missed when initially populating this
list.

> Also I understand you want this patch to go through the net-next tree,
> could you please confirm?

Yes.

Rob