| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <905996ee-9901-4419-b545-35ea9027044c@linux.dev>
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2025 08:12:35 -0700
From: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@...ux.dev>
To: Tariq Toukan <ttoukan.linux@...il.com>, saeedm@...dia.com,
leon@...nel.org, tariqt@...dia.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 rdma-next 1/1] net/mlx5: Fix build -Wframe-larger-than
warnings
在 2025/7/20 3:07, Tariq Toukan 写道:
>
>
> On 18/07/2025 7:19, Zhu Yanjun wrote:
>> Gently ping
>>
>> Zhu Yanjun
>>
>> 在 2025/7/10 20:03, Zhu Yanjun 写道:
>>> When building, the following warnings will appear.
>>> "
>>> pci_irq.c: In function ‘mlx5_ctrl_irq_request’:
>>> pci_irq.c:494:1: warning: the frame size of 1040 bytes is larger
>>> than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
>>>
>>> pci_irq.c: In function ‘mlx5_irq_request_vector’:
>>> pci_irq.c:561:1: warning: the frame size of 1040 bytes is larger
>>> than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
>>>
>>> eq.c: In function ‘comp_irq_request_sf’:
>>> eq.c:897:1: warning: the frame size of 1080 bytes is larger than
>>> 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
>>>
>>> irq_affinity.c: In function ‘irq_pool_request_irq’:
>>> irq_affinity.c:74:1: warning: the frame size of 1048 bytes is larger
>>> than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
>>> "
>>>
>>> These warnings indicate that the stack frame size exceeds 1024 bytes in
>>> these functions.
>>>
>>> To resolve this, instead of allocating large memory buffers on the
>>> stack,
>>> it is better to use kvzalloc to allocate memory dynamically on the
>>> heap.
>>> This approach reduces stack usage and eliminates these frame size
>>> warnings.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@...ux.dev>
>>> ---
>>> v1 -> v2: Add kvfree to error handler;
>>>
>>> 1. This commit only build tests;
>>> 2. All the changes are on configuration path, will not make difference
>>> on the performance;
>>> 3. This commit is just to fix build warnings, not error or bug
>>> fixes. So
>>> not Fixes tag.
>>> ---
>>> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eq.c | 24 +++++++----
>>> .../mellanox/mlx5/core/irq_affinity.c | 19 +++++++--
>>> .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/pci_irq.c | 40
>>> +++++++++++++------
>>> 3 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eq.c b/drivers/
>>> net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eq.c
>>> index dfb079e59d85..4938dd7c3a09 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eq.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eq.c
>>> @@ -873,19 +873,29 @@ static int comp_irq_request_sf(struct
>>> mlx5_core_dev *dev, u16 vecidx)
>>> {
>>> struct mlx5_irq_pool *pool =
>>> mlx5_irq_table_get_comp_irq_pool(dev);
>>> struct mlx5_eq_table *table = dev->priv.eq_table;
>>> - struct irq_affinity_desc af_desc = {};
>>> + struct irq_affinity_desc *af_desc;
>>> struct mlx5_irq *irq;
>>> + af_desc = kvzalloc(sizeof(*af_desc), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> + if (!af_desc)
>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>> +
>>> /* In case SF irq pool does not exist, fallback to the PF irqs*/
>>> - if (!mlx5_irq_pool_is_sf_pool(pool))
>>> + if (!mlx5_irq_pool_is_sf_pool(pool)) {
>>> + kvfree(af_desc);
>>> return comp_irq_request_pci(dev, vecidx);
>>> + }
>>> - af_desc.is_managed = false;
>>> - cpumask_copy(&af_desc.mask, cpu_online_mask);
>>> - cpumask_andnot(&af_desc.mask, &af_desc.mask, &table->used_cpus);
>>> - irq = mlx5_irq_affinity_request(dev, pool, &af_desc);
>>> - if (IS_ERR(irq))
>>> + af_desc->is_managed = false;
>>> + cpumask_copy(&af_desc->mask, cpu_online_mask);
>>> + cpumask_andnot(&af_desc->mask, &af_desc->mask, &table->used_cpus);
>>> + irq = mlx5_irq_affinity_request(dev, pool, af_desc);
>>> + if (IS_ERR(irq)) {
>>> + kvfree(af_desc);
>>> return PTR_ERR(irq);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + kvfree(af_desc);
>>> cpumask_or(&table->used_cpus, &table->used_cpus,
>>> mlx5_irq_get_affinity_mask(irq));
>>> mlx5_core_dbg(pool->dev, "IRQ %u mapped to cpu %*pbl, %u EQs
>>> on this irq\n",
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/irq_affinity.c
>>> b/ drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/irq_affinity.c
>>> index 2691d88cdee1..82d3c2568244 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/irq_affinity.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/irq_affinity.c
>>> @@ -47,29 +47,40 @@ static int cpu_get_least_loaded(struct
>>> mlx5_irq_pool *pool,
>>> static struct mlx5_irq *
>>> irq_pool_request_irq(struct mlx5_irq_pool *pool, struct
>>> irq_affinity_desc *af_desc)
>>> {
>>> - struct irq_affinity_desc auto_desc = {};
>>> + struct irq_affinity_desc *auto_desc;
>>> struct mlx5_irq *irq;
>>> u32 irq_index;
>>> int err;
>>> + auto_desc = kvzalloc(sizeof(*auto_desc), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> + if (!auto_desc)
>>> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>>> +
>>> err = xa_alloc(&pool->irqs, &irq_index, NULL,
>>> pool->xa_num_irqs, GFP_KERNEL);
>>> - if (err)
>>> + if (err) {
>>> + kvfree(auto_desc);
>>> return ERR_PTR(err);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> if (pool->irqs_per_cpu) {
>>> if (cpumask_weight(&af_desc->mask) > 1)
>>> /* if req_mask contain more then one CPU, set the
>>> least loadad CPU
>>> * of req_mask
>>> */
>>> cpumask_set_cpu(cpu_get_least_loaded(pool,
>>> &af_desc->mask),
>>> - &auto_desc.mask);
>>> + &auto_desc->mask);
>>> else
>>> cpu_get(pool, cpumask_first(&af_desc->mask));
>>> }
>>> +
>>> irq = mlx5_irq_alloc(pool, irq_index,
>>> - cpumask_empty(&auto_desc.mask) ? af_desc :
>>> &auto_desc,
>>> + cpumask_empty(&auto_desc->mask) ? af_desc :
>>> auto_desc,
>>> NULL);
>>> if (IS_ERR(irq))
>>> xa_erase(&pool->irqs, irq_index);
>>> +
>>> + kvfree(auto_desc);
>>> +
>>> return irq;
>>> }
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/pci_irq.c b/
>>> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/pci_irq.c
>>> index 40024cfa3099..48aad94b0a5d 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/pci_irq.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/pci_irq.c
>>> @@ -470,26 +470,32 @@ void mlx5_ctrl_irq_release(struct
>>> mlx5_core_dev *dev, struct mlx5_irq *ctrl_irq)
>>> struct mlx5_irq *mlx5_ctrl_irq_request(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
>>> {
>>> struct mlx5_irq_pool *pool = ctrl_irq_pool_get(dev);
>>> - struct irq_affinity_desc af_desc;
>>> + struct irq_affinity_desc *af_desc;
>>> struct mlx5_irq *irq;
>>> - cpumask_copy(&af_desc.mask, cpu_online_mask);
>>> - af_desc.is_managed = false;
>>> + af_desc = kvzalloc(sizeof(*af_desc), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> + if (!af_desc)
>>> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>>> +
>>> + cpumask_copy(&af_desc->mask, cpu_online_mask);
>>> + af_desc->is_managed = false;
>>> if (!mlx5_irq_pool_is_sf_pool(pool)) {
>>> /* In case we are allocating a control IRQ from a pci
>>> device's pool.
>>> * This can happen also for a SF if the SFs pool is empty.
>>> */
>>> if (!pool->xa_num_irqs.max) {
>>> - cpumask_clear(&af_desc.mask);
>>> + cpumask_clear(&af_desc->mask);
>>> /* In case we only have a single IRQ for PF/VF */
>>> - cpumask_set_cpu(cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask),
>>> &af_desc.mask);
>>> + cpumask_set_cpu(cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask),
>>> &af_desc- >mask);
>>> }
>>> /* Allocate the IRQ in index 0. The vector was already
>>> allocated */
>>> - irq = irq_pool_request_vector(pool, 0, &af_desc, NULL);
>>> + irq = irq_pool_request_vector(pool, 0, af_desc, NULL);
>>> } else {
>>> - irq = mlx5_irq_affinity_request(dev, pool, &af_desc);
>>> + irq = mlx5_irq_affinity_request(dev, pool, af_desc);
>>> }
>>> + kvfree(af_desc);
>>> +
>>> return irq;
>>> }
>>> @@ -548,16 +554,26 @@ struct mlx5_irq
>>> *mlx5_irq_request_vector(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, u16 cpu,
>>> {
>>> struct mlx5_irq_table *table = mlx5_irq_table_get(dev);
>>> struct mlx5_irq_pool *pool = table->pcif_pool;
>>> - struct irq_affinity_desc af_desc;
>>> + struct irq_affinity_desc *af_desc;
>>> int offset = MLX5_IRQ_VEC_COMP_BASE;
>>> + struct mlx5_irq *irq;
>>> +
>>> + af_desc = kvzalloc(sizeof(*af_desc), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> + if (!af_desc)
>>> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>>> if (!pool->xa_num_irqs.max)
>>> offset = 0;
>>> - af_desc.is_managed = false;
>>> - cpumask_clear(&af_desc.mask);
>>> - cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &af_desc.mask);
>>> - return mlx5_irq_request(dev, vecidx + offset, &af_desc, rmap);
>>> + af_desc->is_managed = false;
>>> + cpumask_clear(&af_desc->mask);
>>> + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &af_desc->mask);
>>> +
>>> + irq = mlx5_irq_request(dev, vecidx + offset, af_desc, rmap);
>>> +
>>> + kvfree(af_desc);
>>> +
>>> + return irq;
>>> }
>>> static struct mlx5_irq_pool *
>>
>>
>
> Thanks for your patch.
> You're targeting the wrong branch.
>
> For mlx5_core patches, please target net-next.
Thanks a lot. I will send out the latest patch based on net-next.
Zhu Yanjun
--
Best Regards,
Yanjun.Zhu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists