[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6b09d374-528a-4a6d-a6c6-2be840e8a52b-agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2025 09:30:08 +0200
From: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Alexandra Winter <wintera@...ux.ibm.com>,
Thorsten Winkler <twinkler@...ux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>, Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sebastian Ott <sebott@...ux.ibm.com>,
Ursula Braun <ubraun@...ux.ibm.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Aliaksei Makarau <Aliaksei.Makarau@....com>,
Mahanta Jambigi <mjambigi@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] s390/ism: fix concurrency management in ism_cmd()
On Sun, Jul 20, 2025 at 11:11:09PM +0200, Halil Pasic wrote:
Hi Halil,
...
> @@ -129,7 +129,9 @@ static int ism_cmd(struct ism_dev *ism, void *cmd)
> {
> struct ism_req_hdr *req = cmd;
> struct ism_resp_hdr *resp = cmd;
> + unsigned long flags;
>
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&ism->cmd_lock, flags);
I only found smcd_handle_irq() scheduling a tasklet, but no commands issued.
Do we really need disable interrupts?
> __ism_write_cmd(ism, req + 1, sizeof(*req), req->len - sizeof(*req));
> __ism_write_cmd(ism, req, 0, sizeof(*req));
>
> @@ -143,6 +145,7 @@ static int ism_cmd(struct ism_dev *ism, void *cmd)
> }
> __ism_read_cmd(ism, resp + 1, sizeof(*resp), resp->len - sizeof(*resp));
> out:
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ism->cmd_lock, flags);
> return resp->ret;
> }
>
...
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists