netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: Revert tx queue length on partial failure in dev_qdisc_change_tx_queue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250722073330.5bf59b6d@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 07:33:30 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Suchit K <suchitkarunakaran@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
 horms@...nel.org, jhs@...atatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
 jiri@...nulli.us, sdf@...ichev.me, kuniyu@...gle.com,
 aleksander.lobakin@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 skhan@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linux.dev,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Revert tx queue length on partial failure in
 dev_qdisc_change_tx_queue_len()

On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 19:26:01 +0530 Suchit K wrote:
> I'm sorry for the oversight. I'll send a v2 patch shortly to fix it.

Please note that in networking we ask that new versions of patches not
be resubmitted within 24h of previous posting:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html

> In the meantime, could you please give me some insights on testing
> this change? Also, apart from the unsigned int blunder, does the
> overall approach look reasonable? I’d be grateful for any suggestions
> or comments. Thank you.

Hopefully someone reviews before you repost, I didn't look further once
I noticed the static analysis warning.