[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89iLBoSc+x2n0w44HQp8CKumWBkqgYQEOi-enLahFTY02wQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 07:38:03 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>, Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@...nel.org>,
Mat Martineau <martineau@...nel.org>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Geliang Tang <geliang@...nel.org>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>, Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
mptcp@...ts.linux.dev, cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 net-next 05/13] net: Clean up __sk_mem_raise_allocated().
On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 1:36 PM Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> In __sk_mem_raise_allocated(), charged is initialised as true due
> to the weird condition removed in the previous patch.
>
> It makes the variable unreliable by itself, so we have to check
> another variable, memcg, in advance.
>
> Also, we will factorise the common check below for memcg later.
>
> if (mem_cgroup_sockets_enabled && sk->sk_memcg)
>
> As a prep, let's initialise charged as false and memcg as NULL.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists