netdev - Re: [PATCH v3] memcg: expose socket memory pressure in a cgroup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAAVpQUBwS3DFs9BENNNgkKFcMtc7tjZBA0PZ-EZ0WY+dCw8hrA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 11:27:39 -0700
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>
To: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>
Cc: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>, 
	Daniel Sedlak <daniel.sedlak@...77.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, 
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, 
	Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>, 
	David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, 
	Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@...ux.dev>, linux-mm@...ck.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, 
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>, Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>, 
	cgroups@...r.kernel.org, Matyas Hurtik <matyas.hurtik@...77.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] memcg: expose socket memory pressure in a cgroup

On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 10:50 AM Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 10:57:31AM +0200, Michal Koutný wrote:
> > Hello Daniel.
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 09:11:46AM +0200, Daniel Sedlak <daniel.sedlak@...77.com> wrote:
> > >   /sys/fs/cgroup/**/<cgroup name>/memory.net.socket_pressure
> > >
> > > The output value is an integer matching the internal semantics of the
> > > struct mem_cgroup for socket_pressure. It is a periodic re-arm clock,
> > > representing the end of the said socket memory pressure, and once the
> > > clock is re-armed it is set to jiffies + HZ.
> >
> > I don't find it ideal to expose this value in its raw form that is
> > rather an implementation detail.
> >
> > IIUC, the information is possibly valid only during one jiffy interval.
> > How would be the userspace consuming this?
> >
> > I'd consider exposing this as a cummulative counter in memory.stat for
> > simplicity (or possibly cummulative time spent in the pressure
> > condition).
> >
> > Shakeel, how useful is this vmpressure per-cgroup tracking nowadays? I
> > thought it's kind of legacy.
>
>
> Yes vmpressure is legacy and we should not expose raw underlying number
> to the userspace. How about just 0 or 1 and use
> mem_cgroup_under_socket_pressure() underlying? In future if we change
> the underlying implementation, the output of this interface should be
> consistent.

But this is available only for 1 second, and it will not be useful
except for live debugging ?