[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d44b9541-b912-4d3e-8c41-ea2f460ddd17@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 16:57:09 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "Andre B. Oliveira" <anbadeol@...il.com>,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] can: tscan1: CAN_TSCAN1 can depend on PC104
On 7/22/25 5:12 AM, Vincent Mailhol wrote:
> On 22/07/2025 at 19:52, Marc Kleine-Budde a écrit :
>> On 22.07.2025 12:48:41, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>>> On 20.07.2025 17:28:23, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>>> Add a dependency on PC104 to limit (restrict) this driver kconfig
>>>> prompt to kernel configs that have PC104 set.
>>>>
>>>> Add COMPILE_TEST as a possibility for more complete build coverage.
>>>> I tested this build config on x86_64 5 times without problems.
>>>
>>> I've already Vincent's patch [1] on my tree.
>>>
>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250715-can-compile-test-v2-3-f7fd566db86f@wanadoo.fr/
>
> Don't know how I did not realize the conflict when reviewing :D
>
>>> So this doesn't apply any more. Fixing the merge conflicts result in:
>>>
>>> index ba16d7bc09ef..e061e35769bf 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/can/sja1000/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/can/sja1000/Kconfig
>>> @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ config CAN_SJA1000_PLATFORM
>>>
>>> config CAN_TSCAN1
>>> tristate "TS-CAN1 PC104 boards"
>>> - depends on ISA || (COMPILE_TEST && HAS_IOPORT)
>>> + depends on (ISA && PC104) || (COMPILE_TEST && HAS_IOPORT)
>>> help
>>> This driver is for Technologic Systems' TSCAN-1 PC104 boards.
>>> https://www.embeddedts.com/products/TS-CAN1
>>>
>>> Should be ok?
Looks good. Thanks.
>> If no-one complains I'll add this to my can-next tree and remove the
>> Fixes tag. Otherwise stable will pick this up, but it won't apply
>> without Vincent's patch.
>
> I do not really mind if those are not backported. No issue for me to drop the
> fix tag.
Agreed. Not needed.
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists