netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next V6 0/5] selftests: drv-net: Test XDP native support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250723071253.54a97c65@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 07:12:53 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>
Cc: andrew+netdev@...n.ch, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
 pabeni@...hat.com, shuah@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 horms@...nel.org, cratiu@...dia.com, noren@...dia.com, cjubran@...dia.com,
 mbloch@...dia.com, jdamato@...tly.com, sdf@...ichev.me, ast@...nel.org,
 daniel@...earbox.net, hawk@...nel.org, john.fastabend@...il.com,
 nathan@...nel.org, nick.desaulniers+lkml@...il.com, morbo@...gle.com,
 justinstitt@...gle.com, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev, Mohsin Bashir
 <mohsin.bashr@...il.com>, patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V6 0/5] selftests: drv-net: Test XDP native
 support

On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 10:11:57 +0300 Gal Pressman wrote:
> On 23/07/2025 4:30, patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org wrote:
> > Hello:
> > 
> > This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
> > by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>:  
> 
> Jakub, the test was still under active discussion, and you knowingly
> merged it with buggy code, ignoring our comments.
> 
> This is *extremely disrespectful* towards people that spent time
> reviewing, replying and participating in the netdev mailing list.
> 
> I expect better from you, and other netdev maintainers which allow this
> to happen. Please uphold your responsibilities as maintainers towards
> the community, this is unacceptable behavior.

Man, I just want tests upstream. How hard is this to understand.

These tests even work on mlx5, AFAIU, just not if LRO is enabled.

Please at least try to think about what's good for this community.
At least try.