[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <09d52433-74e9-4f69-9a3d-6e99a65b03b5@onemain.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 10:58:47 -0700
From: Shannon Nelson <sln@...main.com>
To: Xiumei Mu <xmu@...hat.com>, Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Long Xin <lxin@...hat.com>, Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] selftests: rtnetlink.sh: remove esp4_offload after
test
(yeah, I made the same non-ASCII mistake...)
On 7/24/25 10:49 AM, Shannon Nelson wrote:
> On 7/24/25 1:20 AM, Xiumei Mu wrote:
>> resent the reply again with "plain text mode"
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 2:25 PM Hangbin Liu<liuhangbin@...il.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Xiumei,
>>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 12:55:02PM +0800, Xiumei Mu wrote:
>>>> The esp4_offload module, loaded during IPsec offload tests, should
>>>> be reset to its default settings after testing.
>>>> Otherwise, leaving it enabled could unintentionally affect subsequence
>>>> test cases by keeping offload active.
>>> Would you please show which subsequence test will be affected?
>> Any general ipsec case, which expects to be tested by default
>> behavior(without offload).
>> esp4_offload will affect the performance.
>>
>>>> Fixes: 2766a11161cc ("selftests: rtnetlink: add ipsec offload API test")
>>> It would be good to Cc the fix commit author. You can use
>>> `./scripts/get_maintainer.pl your_patch_file` to get the contacts you
>>> need to Cc.
>> I used the script to generate the cc list.
>> and I double checked the old email of the author is invalid
>> added his personal email in the cc list:
>>
>> Shannon Nelson<shannon.nelson@...cle.com>. -----> Shannon Nelson
>> <sln@...main.com>
>>
>> get the information from here:
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net.git/commit/?id=a1113cefd7d6
>
> Yep, that was me a couple of corporate email addresses ago. Thanks for
> digging up the new email address. Luckily I have a couple of mail
> filters watching for old email addresses.
>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Xiumei Mu<xmu@...hat.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> tools/testing/selftests/net/rtnetlink.sh | 6 ++++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/rtnetlink.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/rtnetlink.sh
>>>> index 2e8243a65b50..5cc1b5340a1a 100755
>>>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/rtnetlink.sh
>>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/rtnetlink.sh
>>>> @@ -673,6 +673,11 @@ kci_test_ipsec_offload()
>>>> sysfsf=$sysfsd/ipsec
>>>> sysfsnet=/sys/bus/netdevsim/devices/netdevsim0/net/
>>>> probed=false
>>>> + esp4_offload_probed_default=false
>>>> +
>>>> + if lsmod | grep -q esp4_offload; then
>>>> + esp4_offload_probed_default=true
>>>> + fi
>>> If the mode is loaded by default, how to avoid the subsequence test to be
>>> failed?
>> The module is not loaded by default, but some users or testers may
>> need to load esp4_offload in their own environments.
>> Therefore, resetting it to the default configuration is the best
>> practice to prevent this self-test case from impacting subsequent
>> tests
>
> Seems reasonable to me.
>
>>>> if ! mount | grep -q debugfs; then
>>>> mount -t debugfs none /sys/kernel/debug/ &> /dev/null
>>>> @@ -766,6 +771,7 @@ EOF
>>>> fi
>>>>
>>>> # clean up any leftovers
>>>> + [ $esp4_offload_probed_default == false ] && rmmod esp4_offload
>>> The new patch need to pass shellcheck. We need to double quote the variable.
>> Thanks your comment, I will add double quote in patchv2
>
> Or you keep with the existing style as done a line or two later:
> $esp4_offload_probed_default && rmmod esp4_offload Either way,
> Reviewed-by: Shannon Nelson <sln@...main.com> Cheers, sln
>>> Thanks
>>> Hangbin
>>>> echo 0 > /sys/bus/netdevsim/del_device
>>>> $probed && rmmod netdevsim
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> 2.50.1
>>>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists