[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aIGykkgqktjgLvVI@fedora>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 04:12:02 +0000
From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jay Vosburgh <jv@...sburgh.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/2] selftests: bonding: add test for passive LACP
mode
On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 04:06:03AM +0000, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 11:37:54AM +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/bonding/bond_passive_lacp.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/bonding/bond_passive_lacp.sh
> > > new file mode 100755
> > > index 000000000000..4cf8a5999aaa
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/bonding/bond_passive_lacp.sh
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
> > > +#!/bin/sh
> > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > > +#
> > > +# Testing if bond works with lacp_active = off
> > > +
> > > +lib_dir=$(dirname "$0")
> > > +source ${lib_dir}/bond_topo_lacp.sh
> >
> > shellcheck is not super happy about 'source' usage:
> >
> > In bond_passive_lacp.sh line 7:
> > source ${lib_dir}/bond_topo_lacp.sh
> > ^-- SC3046 (warning): In POSIX sh, 'source' in place of '.' is undefined.
> > ^-- SC3051 (warning): In POSIX sh, 'source' in place of '.' is undefined.
> >
> > either switch to '. ' or use bash instead of 'sh'.
>
> Hi Paolo,
>
> I updated the case and remove the source file bond_topo_lacp.sh.
> Instead I source the forwarding lib directly like:
>
> lib_dir=$(dirname "$0")
> source "$lib_dir"/../../../net/forwarding/lib.sh
>
> But this cause shell check unable to find the lib.sh as $lib_dir is get
> dynamically. This usage is common in selftest. How should we resolves this
> problem?
OK, I just disabled this warning.
# shellcheck disable=SC1091
Hangbin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists