[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADdRzaF5Ck86fyEYaeWjvoVt=8qEhNKJ8J3ye+x0cb9EATqQ7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 16:20:31 +0800
From: Xiumei Mu <xmu@...hat.com>
To: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Long Xin <lxin@...hat.com>,
Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>, Shannon Nelson <sln@...main.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] selftests: rtnetlink.sh: remove esp4_offload after test
resent the reply again with "plain text mode"
On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 2:25 PM Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Xiumei,
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 12:55:02PM +0800, Xiumei Mu wrote:
> > The esp4_offload module, loaded during IPsec offload tests, should
> > be reset to its default settings after testing.
> > Otherwise, leaving it enabled could unintentionally affect subsequence
> > test cases by keeping offload active.
>
> Would you please show which subsequence test will be affected?
>
Any general ipsec case, which expects to be tested by default
behavior(without offload).
esp4_offload will affect the performance.
> >
> > Fixes: 2766a11161cc ("selftests: rtnetlink: add ipsec offload API test")
>
> It would be good to Cc the fix commit author. You can use
> `./scripts/get_maintainer.pl your_patch_file` to get the contacts you
> need to Cc.
I used the script to generate the cc list.
and I double checked the old email of the author is invalid
added his personal email in the cc list:
Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@...cle.com>. -----> Shannon Nelson
<sln@...main.com>
get the information from here:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net.git/commit/?id=a1113cefd7d6
>
> > Signed-off-by: Xiumei Mu <xmu@...hat.com>
> > ---
> > tools/testing/selftests/net/rtnetlink.sh | 6 ++++++
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/rtnetlink.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/rtnetlink.sh
> > index 2e8243a65b50..5cc1b5340a1a 100755
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/rtnetlink.sh
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/rtnetlink.sh
> > @@ -673,6 +673,11 @@ kci_test_ipsec_offload()
> > sysfsf=$sysfsd/ipsec
> > sysfsnet=/sys/bus/netdevsim/devices/netdevsim0/net/
> > probed=false
> > + esp4_offload_probed_default=false
> > +
> > + if lsmod | grep -q esp4_offload; then
> > + esp4_offload_probed_default=true
> > + fi
>
> If the mode is loaded by default, how to avoid the subsequence test to be
> failed?
The module is not loaded by default, but some users or testers may
need to load esp4_offload in their own environments.
Therefore, resetting it to the default configuration is the best
practice to prevent this self-test case from impacting subsequent
tests
>
> >
> > if ! mount | grep -q debugfs; then
> > mount -t debugfs none /sys/kernel/debug/ &> /dev/null
> > @@ -766,6 +771,7 @@ EOF
> > fi
> >
> > # clean up any leftovers
> > + [ $esp4_offload_probed_default == false ] && rmmod esp4_offload
>
> The new patch need to pass shellcheck. We need to double quote the variable.
Thanks your comment, I will add double quote in patchv2
>
> Thanks
> Hangbin
> > echo 0 > /sys/bus/netdevsim/del_device
> > $probed && rmmod netdevsim
> >
> > --
> > 2.50.1
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists