| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAL+tcoADu-ZZewsZzGDaL7NugxFTWO_Q+7WsLHs3Mx-XHjJnyg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 20:11:18 +0800
From: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>
To: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@...el.com>
Cc: anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com,
andrew+netdev@...n.ch, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, bjorn@...nel.org,
magnus.karlsson@...el.com, maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com,
jonathan.lemon@...il.com, sdf@...ichev.me, ast@...nel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net, hawk@...nel.org, john.fastabend@...il.com,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/5] ixgbe: xsk: support batched xsk Tx
interfaces to increase performance
On Fri, Jul 25, 2025 at 6:52 PM Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@...el.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2025 at 05:11:22PM +0800, Jason Xing wrote:
> > From: Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>
> >
> > Like what i40e driver initially did in commit 3106c580fb7cf
> > ("i40e: Use batched xsk Tx interfaces to increase performance"), use
> > the batched xsk feature to transmit packets.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_xsk.c | 106 +++++++++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_xsk.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_xsk.c
> > index f3d3f5c1cdc7..9fe2c4bf8bc5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_xsk.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_xsk.c
> > @@ -2,12 +2,15 @@
> > /* Copyright(c) 2018 Intel Corporation. */
> >
> > #include <linux/bpf_trace.h>
> > +#include <linux/unroll.h>
> > #include <net/xdp_sock_drv.h>
> > #include <net/xdp.h>
> >
> > #include "ixgbe.h"
> > #include "ixgbe_txrx_common.h"
> >
> > +#define PKTS_PER_BATCH 4
> > +
> > struct xsk_buff_pool *ixgbe_xsk_pool(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter,
> > struct ixgbe_ring *ring)
> > {
> > @@ -388,58 +391,93 @@ void ixgbe_xsk_clean_rx_ring(struct ixgbe_ring *rx_ring)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > -static bool ixgbe_xmit_zc(struct ixgbe_ring *xdp_ring, unsigned int budget)
> > +static void ixgbe_set_rs_bit(struct ixgbe_ring *xdp_ring)
> > +{
> > + u16 ntu = xdp_ring->next_to_use ? xdp_ring->next_to_use - 1 : xdp_ring->count - 1;
> > + union ixgbe_adv_tx_desc *tx_desc;
> > +
> > + tx_desc = IXGBE_TX_DESC(xdp_ring, ntu);
> > + tx_desc->read.cmd_type_len |= cpu_to_le32(IXGBE_TXD_CMD_RS);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void ixgbe_xmit_pkt(struct ixgbe_ring *xdp_ring, struct xdp_desc *desc,
> > + int i)
> > +
>
> `i` parameter seems redundant here, why not just pass desc + i as a parameter?
Let me resolve this :)
Thanks,
Jason
>
> > {
> > struct xsk_buff_pool *pool = xdp_ring->xsk_pool;
> > union ixgbe_adv_tx_desc *tx_desc = NULL;
> > struct ixgbe_tx_buffer *tx_bi;
> > - struct xdp_desc desc;
> > dma_addr_t dma;
> > u32 cmd_type;
> >
> > - if (!budget)
> > - return true;
> > + dma = xsk_buff_raw_get_dma(pool, desc[i].addr);
> > + xsk_buff_raw_dma_sync_for_device(pool, dma, desc[i].len);
> >
> > - while (likely(budget)) {
> > - if (!netif_carrier_ok(xdp_ring->netdev))
> > - break;
> > + tx_bi = &xdp_ring->tx_buffer_info[xdp_ring->next_to_use];
> > + tx_bi->bytecount = desc[i].len;
> > + tx_bi->xdpf = NULL;
> > + tx_bi->gso_segs = 1;
> >
> > - if (!xsk_tx_peek_desc(pool, &desc))
> > - break;
> > + tx_desc = IXGBE_TX_DESC(xdp_ring, xdp_ring->next_to_use);
> > + tx_desc->read.buffer_addr = cpu_to_le64(dma);
> >
> > - dma = xsk_buff_raw_get_dma(pool, desc.addr);
> > - xsk_buff_raw_dma_sync_for_device(pool, dma, desc.len);
> > + cmd_type = IXGBE_ADVTXD_DTYP_DATA |
> > + IXGBE_ADVTXD_DCMD_DEXT |
> > + IXGBE_ADVTXD_DCMD_IFCS;
> > + cmd_type |= desc[i].len | IXGBE_TXD_CMD_EOP;
> > + tx_desc->read.cmd_type_len = cpu_to_le32(cmd_type);
> > + tx_desc->read.olinfo_status =
> > + cpu_to_le32(desc[i].len << IXGBE_ADVTXD_PAYLEN_SHIFT);
> >
> > - tx_bi = &xdp_ring->tx_buffer_info[xdp_ring->next_to_use];
> > - tx_bi->bytecount = desc.len;
> > - tx_bi->xdpf = NULL;
> > - tx_bi->gso_segs = 1;
> > + xdp_ring->next_to_use++;
> > +}
> >
> > - tx_desc = IXGBE_TX_DESC(xdp_ring, xdp_ring->next_to_use);
> > - tx_desc->read.buffer_addr = cpu_to_le64(dma);
> > +static void ixgbe_xmit_pkt_batch(struct ixgbe_ring *xdp_ring, struct xdp_desc *desc)
> > +{
> > + u32 i;
> >
> > - /* put descriptor type bits */
> > - cmd_type = IXGBE_ADVTXD_DTYP_DATA |
> > - IXGBE_ADVTXD_DCMD_DEXT |
> > - IXGBE_ADVTXD_DCMD_IFCS;
> > - cmd_type |= desc.len | IXGBE_TXD_CMD;
> > - tx_desc->read.cmd_type_len = cpu_to_le32(cmd_type);
> > - tx_desc->read.olinfo_status =
> > - cpu_to_le32(desc.len << IXGBE_ADVTXD_PAYLEN_SHIFT);
> > + unrolled_count(PKTS_PER_BATCH)
> > + for (i = 0; i < PKTS_PER_BATCH; i++)
> > + ixgbe_xmit_pkt(xdp_ring, desc, i);
> > +}
> >
> > - xdp_ring->next_to_use++;
> > - if (xdp_ring->next_to_use == xdp_ring->count)
> > - xdp_ring->next_to_use = 0;
> > +static void ixgbe_fill_tx_hw_ring(struct ixgbe_ring *xdp_ring,
> > + struct xdp_desc *descs, u32 nb_pkts)
> > +{
> > + u32 batched, leftover, i;
> > +
> > + batched = nb_pkts & ~(PKTS_PER_BATCH - 1);
> > + leftover = nb_pkts & (PKTS_PER_BATCH - 1);
> > + for (i = 0; i < batched; i += PKTS_PER_BATCH)
> > + ixgbe_xmit_pkt_batch(xdp_ring, &descs[i]);
> > + for (i = batched; i < batched + leftover; i++)
> > + ixgbe_xmit_pkt(xdp_ring, &descs[i], 0);
> > +}
> >
> > - budget--;
> > - }
> > +static bool ixgbe_xmit_zc(struct ixgbe_ring *xdp_ring, unsigned int budget)
> > +{
> > + struct xdp_desc *descs = xdp_ring->xsk_pool->tx_descs;
> > + u32 nb_pkts, nb_processed = 0;
> >
> > - if (tx_desc) {
> > - ixgbe_xdp_ring_update_tail(xdp_ring);
> > - xsk_tx_release(pool);
> > + if (!netif_carrier_ok(xdp_ring->netdev))
> > + return true;
> > +
> > + nb_pkts = xsk_tx_peek_release_desc_batch(xdp_ring->xsk_pool, budget);
> > + if (!nb_pkts)
> > + return true;
> > +
> > + if (xdp_ring->next_to_use + nb_pkts >= xdp_ring->count) {
> > + nb_processed = xdp_ring->count - xdp_ring->next_to_use;
> > + ixgbe_fill_tx_hw_ring(xdp_ring, descs, nb_processed);
> > + xdp_ring->next_to_use = 0;
> > }
> >
> > - return !!budget;
> > + ixgbe_fill_tx_hw_ring(xdp_ring, &descs[nb_processed], nb_pkts - nb_processed);
> > +
> > + ixgbe_set_rs_bit(xdp_ring);
> > + ixgbe_xdp_ring_update_tail(xdp_ring);
> > +
> > + return nb_pkts < budget;
> > }
> >
> > static void ixgbe_clean_xdp_tx_buffer(struct ixgbe_ring *tx_ring,
> > --
> > 2.41.3
> >
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists