[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <FC2BC3FF-21F2-4166-9ACD-E14FE722793D@collabora.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2025 09:44:39 -0300
From: Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
andrew@...n.ch,
hkallweit1@...il.com,
tmgross@...ch.edu,
ojeda@...nel.org,
alex.gaynor@...il.com,
gary@...yguo.net,
bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com,
benno.lossin@...ton.me,
a.hindborg@...sung.com,
aliceryhl@...gle.com,
anna-maria@...utronix.de,
frederic@...nel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de,
arnd@...db.de,
jstultz@...gle.com,
sboyd@...nel.org,
mingo@...hat.com,
peterz@...radead.org,
juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com,
rostedt@...dmis.org,
bsegall@...gle.com,
mgorman@...e.de,
vschneid@...hat.com,
tgunders@...hat.com,
me@...enk.dev,
david.laight.linux@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 7/8] rust: Add read_poll_timeout functions
Hi Fujita,
> On 20 Feb 2025, at 04:06, FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Add read_poll_timeout functions which poll periodically until a
> condition is met or a timeout is reached.
>
> The C's read_poll_timeout (include/linux/iopoll.h) is a complicated
> macro and a simple wrapper for Rust doesn't work. So this implements
> the same functionality in Rust.
>
> The C version uses usleep_range() while the Rust version uses
> fsleep(), which uses the best sleep method so it works with spans that
> usleep_range() doesn't work nicely with.
>
> The sleep_before_read argument isn't supported since there is no user
> for now. It's rarely used in the C version.
>
> read_poll_timeout() can only be used in a nonatomic context. This
> requirement is not checked by these abstractions, but it is intended
> that klint [1] or a similar tool will be used to check it in the
> future.
>
> Link: https://rust-for-linux.com/klint [1]
> Tested-by: Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>
> Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@...il.com>
This appears to be the last version of this patch. Do you have any plans to
keep working on it? Is there anything I can do to help? :)
If you don’t have the time to work on this, I can pick it up for you.
— Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists