[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b25eff85-73fd-45b3-b92f-5cc0a86011c7@foss.st.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 17:05:39 +0200
From: Gatien CHEVALLIER <gatien.chevallier@...s.st.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni
<pabeni@...hat.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre
Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Richard Cochran
<richardcochran@...il.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: stmmac: allow generation of flexible
PPS relative to MAC time
On 7/28/25 17:58, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jul 2025 10:15:07 +0200 Gatien CHEVALLIER wrote:
>> Maybe we could compare the time to the current MAC system
>> time and, if the start time is in the past, consider the
>> value to be an offset. Therefore, any value set in the past
>> would be considered as an offset. I see some implementations
>> doing either that or replacing any value set in the past to
>> a safe start + a fixed offset.
>
> Let's try this.
Ok, I sent a V2 with a proposal implementing this behavior.
Thank you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists