[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aIkQxlqmg9_EFqsI@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 19:19:50 +0100
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Gatien CHEVALLIER <gatien.chevallier@...s.st.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [Linux-stm32] [PATCH RFC net-next 6/7] net: stmmac: add helpers
to indicate WoL enable status
On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 07:27:11PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> And i did notice that the Broadcom code is the only one doing anything
> with enable_irq_wake()/disable_irq_wake(). We need to scatter these
> into the drivers.
It's better to use devm_pm_set_wake_irq() in the probe function, and
then let the core code (drivers/base/power/wakeup.c and
drivers/base/power/wakeirq.c) handle it. This is what I'm doing for
the rtl8211f.
IRQ wake gets enabled/disabled at suspend/resume time, rather than
when the device wakeup state changes, which I believe is what is
preferred.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists