[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250730180215.2ad7df72@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2025 18:02:15 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Michal Luczaj <mhal@...x.co>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman
<horms@...nel.org>, Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com>, Tom Herbert
<tom@...bertland.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] kcm: Fix splice support
On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 12:33:04 +0200 Michal Luczaj wrote:
> Flags passed in for splice() syscall should not end up in
> skb_recv_datagram(). As SPLICE_F_NONBLOCK == MSG_PEEK, kernel gets
> confused: skb isn't unlinked from a receive queue, while strp_msg::offset
> and strp_msg::full_len are updated.
>
> Unbreak the logic a bit more by mapping both O_NONBLOCK and
> SPLICE_F_NONBLOCK to MSG_DONTWAIT. This way we align with man splice(2) in
> regard to errno EAGAIN:
>
> SPLICE_F_NONBLOCK was specified in flags or one of the file descriptors
> had been marked as nonblocking (O_NONBLOCK), and the operation would
> block.
Coincidentally looks like we're not honoring
sock->file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK
in TLS..
Powered by blists - more mailing lists