netdev - Re: [PATCH net] selftests: netdevsim: Xfail nexthop test on slow machines

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: 
 <175443780651.2205590.13469597711317035634.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2025 23:50:06 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
 pabeni@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
 petrm@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] selftests: netdevsim: Xfail nexthop test on slow
 machines

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>:

On Mon, 4 Aug 2025 14:43:20 +0300 you wrote:
> A lot of test cases in the file are related to the idle and unbalanced
> timers of resilient nexthop groups and these tests are reported to be
> flaky on slow machines running debug kernels.
> 
> Rather than marking a lot of individual tests with xfail_on_slow(),
> simply mark all the tests. Note that the test is stable on non-debug
> machines and that with debug kernels we are mainly interested in the
> output of various sanitizers in order to determine pass / fail.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net] selftests: netdevsim: Xfail nexthop test on slow machines
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/8d22aea8af0d

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html