[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOiHx=mW8B2vQ7UhauPJpJ9KmtxTZ2-1MC3Vf2uNF9RaJ4WQ5A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2025 12:01:54 +0200
From: Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski@...il.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@...il.com>,
Kyle Hendry <kylehendrydev@...il.com>,
"Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/21] dsa: b53: hide legacy gpiolib usage on non-mips
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 8, 2025 at 5:23 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>
> The MIPS bcm53xx platform still uses the legacy gpiolib interfaces based
> on gpio numbers, but other platforms do not.
>
> Hide these interfaces inside of the existing #ifdef block and use the
> modern interfaces in the common parts of the driver to allow building
> it when the gpio_set_value() is left out of the kernel.
Looks reasonable, but doesn't compile:
CC drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_spi.o
In file included from drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_spi.c:27:
drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_priv.h:378:15: error: unknown type name 'gpio_desc'
378 | static inline gpio_desc *b53_switch_get_reset_gpio(struct
b53_device *dev)
| ^~~~~~~~~
drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_priv.h: In function 'b53_switch_get_reset_gpio':
drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_priv.h:392:14: error: implicit declaration of
function 'gpio_is_valid'; did you mean 'uuid_is_valid'?
[-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
392 | if (!gpio_is_valid(gpio))
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
| uuid_is_valid
drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_priv.h:395:15: error: implicit declaration of
function 'devm_gpiod_request_one' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
395 | ret = devm_gpiod_request_one(dev->dev, gpio,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_priv.h:396:38: error: 'GPIOF_OUT_INIT_HIGH'
undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean
'GPIOD_OUT_HIGH'?
396 | GPIOF_OUT_INIT_HIGH, "robo_reset");
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| GPIOD_OUT_HIGH
drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_priv.h:396:38: note: each undeclared
identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_priv.h:400:16: error: returning 'struct
gpio_desc *' from a function with incompatible return type 'int *'
[-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
400 | return gpio_to_desc(gpio);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> ---
> drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_common.c | 17 +++++------------
> drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_priv.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
> 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_common.c b/drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_common.c
> index 9942fb6f7f4b..cb57bcc56c63 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_common.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_common.c
> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
>
> #include <linux/delay.h>
> #include <linux/export.h>
> -#include <linux/gpio.h>
this include is now needed for b53_priv.h.
> +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/math.h>
> #include <linux/minmax.h>
> @@ -948,17 +948,17 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(b53_configure_vlan);
>
> static void b53_switch_reset_gpio(struct b53_device *dev)
> {
> - int gpio = dev->reset_gpio;
> + struct gpio_desc *gpio = dev->reset_gpio;
>
> - if (gpio < 0)
> + if (IS_ERR(gpio))
> return;
>
> /* Reset sequence: RESET low(50ms)->high(20ms)
> */
> - gpio_set_value(gpio, 0);
> + gpiod_set_value(gpio, 0);
> mdelay(50);
>
> - gpio_set_value(gpio, 1);
> + gpiod_set_value(gpio, 1);
> mdelay(20);
>
> dev->current_page = 0xff;
> @@ -2925,7 +2925,6 @@ static int b53_switch_init(struct b53_device *dev)
> {
> u32 chip_id = dev->chip_id;
> unsigned int i;
> - int ret;
>
> if (is63xx(dev))
> chip_id = BCM63XX_DEVICE_ID;
> @@ -3005,12 +3004,6 @@ static int b53_switch_init(struct b53_device *dev)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> dev->reset_gpio = b53_switch_get_reset_gpio(dev);
> - if (dev->reset_gpio >= 0) {
> - ret = devm_gpio_request_one(dev->dev, dev->reset_gpio,
> - GPIOF_OUT_INIT_HIGH, "robo_reset");
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> - }
>
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_priv.h b/drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_priv.h
> index 458775f95164..16e82653a7c6 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_priv.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_priv.h
> @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ struct b53_device {
> u8 duplex_reg;
> u8 jumbo_pm_reg;
> u8 jumbo_size_reg;
> - int reset_gpio;
> + struct gpio_desc *reset_gpio;
> u8 num_arl_bins;
> u16 num_arl_buckets;
> enum dsa_tag_protocol tag_protocol;
> @@ -375,22 +375,34 @@ static inline void b53_arl_from_entry_25(u64 *mac_vid,
>
> #include <linux/bcm47xx_nvram.h>
> #include <bcm47xx_board.h>
> -static inline int b53_switch_get_reset_gpio(struct b53_device *dev)
> +static inline gpio_desc *b53_switch_get_reset_gpio(struct b53_device *dev)
s/gpio_desc/struct gpio_desc/
> {
> enum bcm47xx_board board = bcm47xx_board_get();
> + int gpio, ret;
>
> switch (board) {
> case BCM47XX_BOARD_LINKSYS_WRT300NV11:
> case BCM47XX_BOARD_LINKSYS_WRT310NV1:
> - return 8;
> + gpio = 8;
> + break;
> default:
> - return bcm47xx_nvram_gpio_pin("robo_reset");
> + gpio = bcm47xx_nvram_gpio_pin("robo_reset");
> }
> +
> + if (!gpio_is_valid(gpio))
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +
> + ret = devm_gpiod_request_one(dev->dev, gpio,
s/devm_gpiod_request_one/devm_gpio_request_one/
> + GPIOF_OUT_INIT_HIGH, "robo_reset");
> + if (ret)
> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> +
> + return gpio_to_desc(gpio);
> }
> #else
> -static inline int b53_switch_get_reset_gpio(struct b53_device *dev)
> +static inline struct gpio_desc *b53_switch_get_reset_gpio(struct b53_device *dev)
> {
> - return -ENOENT;
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> }
> #endif
Can't really test this (no matching hardware), but with the code issues fixed
Reviewed-by: Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski@...il.com>
Best regards,
Jonas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists