netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: af_packet: Use hrtimer to do the retire operation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20250809144431.1784097-1-jackzxcui1989@163.com>
Date: Sat,  9 Aug 2025 22:44:31 +0800
From: Xin Zhao <jackzxcui1989@....com>
To: willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com,
	edumazet@...gle.com,
	ferenc@...es.dev
Cc: davem@...emloft.net,
	kuba@...nel.org,
	pabeni@...hat.com,
	horms@...nel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: af_packet: Use hrtimer to do the retire operation

On Sat, 2025-08-09 at 21:45 +0800, Willem wrote:

> This is a resubmit of the patch you yesterday [1]? While the
> discussion on the original patch was ongoing too.

> Net-next is also closed. See also see also
> Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst for the process.

> I'll take a closer look later. Agreed in principle that it's
> preferable to replace timer with hrtimer than to add a CONFIG to
> select between them.

> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250808032623.11485-1-jackzxcui1989@163.com/


Dear Willem，

Yes, you're right. I noticed that the title of the patch I submitted yesterday was
incorrect; it should be "use" instead of "user." Additionally, the title was a bit
too long, so I resubmitted it.
As you mentioned, I took Eric's advice and removed the new config, directly
modifying the code instead. Since the title has changed, I didn't use the "PATCH v1"
format.


Thanks
Xin Zhao