[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250811084414.6089720d@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 08:44:14 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
Cc: Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>, Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>, Andrew
Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric
Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Matthias
Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, Ryder Lee
<ryder.lee@...iatek.com>, Shayne Chen <shayne.chen@...iatek.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, Rex Lu
<rex.lu@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: mediatek: wed: Introduce MT7992 WED
support to MT7988 SoC
On Mon, 11 Aug 2025 17:23:25 +0200 Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > Introduce the second WDMA RX ring in WED driver for MT7988 SoC since the
> > Mediatek MT7992 WiFi chipset supports two separated WDMA rings.
> > Add missing MT7988 configurations to properly support WED for MT7992 in
> > MT76 driver.
>
> I sent this email twice wrongly. Please ignore this one.
patchwork decided to ignore the other one.
Are they identical?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists