netdev - Re: [PATCH v10 00/14] Don't generate netlink .rst files inside $(srctree)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87ms85daya.fsf@trenco.lwn.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 11:28:45 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>, "Message-ID :"
 <cover.1752076293.git.mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>, Linux Doc Mailing List
 <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>, "David S.
 Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Ignacio Encinas Rubio
 <ignacio@...cinas.com>, Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>, Shuah Khan
 <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>, Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@...il.com>, Eric
 Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jan Stancek <jstancek@...hat.com>, Paolo
 Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Ruben Wauters <rubenru09@....com>,
 joel@...lfernandes.org, linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linux.dev,
 lkmm@...ts.linux.dev, netdev@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
 stern@...land.harvard.edu, Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>, Randy Dunlap
 <rdunlap@...radead.org>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Simon Horman
 <horms@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/14] Don't generate netlink .rst files inside
 $(srctree)

Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org> writes:

> Hi Jon,
>
> That's the v10 version of the parser-yaml series, addressing a couple of
> issues raised by Donald.
>
> It should apply cleanly on the top of docs-next, as I just rebased on
> the top of docs/docs-next.
>
> Please merge it via your tree, as I have another patch series that will
> depend on this one.

I intend to do that shortly unless I hear objections; are the netdev
folks OK with this work going through docs-next?

Thanks,

jon