[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250812082920.26bae903@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2025 08:29:20 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>
Cc: netdev-driver-reviewers@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Sean
Anderson <sean.anderson@...ux.dev>, Maxime Chevallier
<maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [ANN] netdev call - Aug 12th
On Tue, 12 Aug 2025 16:16:53 +0100 Daniel Golle wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 07:55:10AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > The bi-weekly call is scheduled for tomorrow at 8:30 am (PT) /
> > 5:30 pm (~EU), at https://bbb.lwn.net/rooms/ldm-chf-zxx-we7/join
> >
> > Sorry for the late announcement, I got out of the habit of sending
> > these. Luckily Daniel pinged.
> >
> > Daniel do you think it still makes sense to talk about the PCS driver,
> > or did folks assume the that call is not happning?
>
> It could make sense to talk about it, but maybe we talk about other
> topics first to Sean can join us as well. However, I think mostly we
> depend on Russell or someone else to make a decision in terms of how the
> three of us (Christian, Sean and I) should continue.
Well, then I'm not sure if a meeting is the right approach in the first
place. Perhaps it's just my feeling but in corporate world managers call
meetings to force a decision (conclave-style). Upstream we force
decisions by having patches ready to be merged on the list.
I would like to avoid anyone ever feeling obligated to join a meeting
as part of their upstream work.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists