netdev - Re: [PATCH] sfc: replace min/max nesting with clamp()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <15275726-396a-49d3-af41-f9f2bede0f2a@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 14:31:36 +0100
From: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>
To: Xichao Zhao <zhao.xichao@...o.com>, andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
 davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-net-drivers@....com,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sfc: replace min/max nesting with clamp()

On 12/08/2025 07:50, Xichao Zhao wrote:
> The clamp() macro explicitly expresses the intent of constraining
> a value within bounds.Therefore, replacing min(max(a, b), c) with
> clamp(val, lo, hi) can improve code readability.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xichao Zhao <zhao.xichao@...o.com>

Reviewed-by: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>