netdev - Re: [RFC net-next 0/3] net: dsa: yt921x: Add support for Motorcomm YT921x

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <94d10725-e69f-4a08-954a-db66b384b2f1@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 09:01:34 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: David Yang <mmyangfl@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
 "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
 Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 0/3] net: dsa: yt921x: Add support for Motorcomm
 YT921x

On 14/08/2025 08:50, David Yang wrote:
> Motorcomm YT921x is a series of ethernet switches developed by Shanghai
> Motorcomm Electronic Technology, including:
> 
>   - YT9215S / YT9215RB / YT9215SC: 5 GbE phys
>   - YT9213NB / YT9214NB: 2 GbE phys
>   - YT9218N / YT9218MB: 8 GbE phys
> 
> and up to 2 serdes interfaces.
> 
> This patch adds basic support for a working DSA switch.
> 
> previous rfc: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250808173808.273774-1-mmyangfl@gmail.com/

So that's a v2? Please version your patches correctly, e.g. use b4 or
git format-patch -vX, and add changelog in cover letter or under '---'
of individual patches describing changes from previous version.

>   - fix coding style
>   - add dt binding
>   - add support for fdb, vlan and bridge

Please also explain why this is RFC, why this is not ready for review.

Best regards,
Krzysztof