[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250815182930.196973bb@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2025 18:29:30 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Lukasz Majewski <lukasz.majewski@...lbox.org>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, davem@...emloft.net, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Rob Herring
<robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Sascha Hauer
<s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, Richard Cochran
<richardcochran@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
imx@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Stefan Wahren
<wahrenst@....net>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn
<andrew@...n.ch>
Subject: Re: [net-next v18 2/7] net: mtip: The L2 switch driver for imx287
On Wed, 13 Aug 2025 09:07:50 +0200 Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> + pkts = mtip_switch_rx(napi->dev, budget, &port);
> + if (pkts == -ENOMEM) {
> + napi_complete(napi);
> + return 0;
And what happens next? looks like you're not unmasking the interrupt in
this case so we'll never get an IRQ until timeout kicks in?
> + }
> +
> + if ((port == 1 || port == 2) && fep->ndev[port - 1])
> + mtip_switch_tx(fep->ndev[port - 1]);
> + else
> + mtip_switch_tx(napi->dev);
> +
> + if (pkts < budget) {
> + napi_complete_done(napi, pkts);
Please take napi_complete_done()'s return value into account
> + /* Set default interrupt mask for L2 switch */
> + writel(MCF_ESW_IMR_RXF | MCF_ESW_IMR_TXF,
> + fep->hwp + ESW_IMR);
> + }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists