netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: Document J-Core

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <35bba6dd1d6faf1b977f7d5eb74be7c4@artur-rojek.eu>
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2025 12:34:51 +0200
From: Artur Rojek <contact@...ur-rojek.eu>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>, Rob Landley
 <rob@...dley.net>, Jeff Dionne <jeff@...esemi.io>, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
 <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David
 S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub
 Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Rob Herring
 <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: Document J-Core

On 2025-08-16 11:40, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 16/08/2025 10:22, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> Hi Krzysztof,

Hi Krzysztof,
thanks for the review!

>> 
>> On Sat, 16 Aug 2025 at 10:18, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> 
>> wrote:
>>> On 15/08/2025 21:48, Artur Rojek wrote:
>>>> J-Core is a clean-room open source processor and SoC design using 
>>>> the
>>>> SuperH instruction set.
>>>> 
>>>> The 'jcore' prefix is in use by IP cores originating from this 
>>>> design.
>>>> 
>>>> Link: https://j-core.org
>>>> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
>>> 
>>> How is it possible if this is v1? If this is not v1, where is 
>>> changelog
>>> and why isn't it marked as vx?
>> 
>> The patch series had several iterations (v0, v-1, v-2 ;-), with a 
>> limited
>> audience.
> 
> Thanks, would be nice to see it reflected somewhere.

I mentioned it in the cover letter.

For the record:
v1: capitalize Open Processor
v0: new patch

Cheers,
Artur

> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof