[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9b6b42be0d7fb60b12203fe4f0f762e882f0d798.1755499376.git.asml.silence@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 14:57:17 +0100
From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: asml.silence@...il.com,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
horms@...nel.org,
davem@...emloft.net,
sdf@...ichev.me,
almasrymina@...gle.com,
dw@...idwei.uk,
michael.chan@...adcom.com,
dtatulea@...dia.com,
ap420073@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
io-uring@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next v3 01/23] net: page_pool: sanitise allocation order
We're going to give more control over rx buffer sizes to user space, and
since we can't always rely on driver validation, let's sanitise it in
page_pool_init() as well. Note that we only need to reject over
MAX_PAGE_ORDER allocations for normal page pools, as current memory
providers don't need to use the buddy allocator and must check the order
on init.
Suggested-by: Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
---
net/core/page_pool.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/core/page_pool.c b/net/core/page_pool.c
index 343a6cac21e3..630e34533b16 100644
--- a/net/core/page_pool.c
+++ b/net/core/page_pool.c
@@ -303,6 +303,9 @@ static int page_pool_init(struct page_pool *pool,
}
static_branch_inc(&page_pool_mem_providers);
+ } else if (pool->p.order > MAX_PAGE_ORDER) {
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ goto free_ptr_ring;
}
return 0;
--
2.49.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists