[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9b55ae03-01b3-4a49-8eb7-b1f24e9e1ce0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 14:59:46 +0100
From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Willem de Bruijn
<willemb@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
andrew+netdev@...n.ch, horms@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
sdf@...ichev.me, almasrymina@...gle.com, dw@...idwei.uk,
michael.chan@...adcom.com, dtatulea@...dia.com, ap420073@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, io-uring@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 00/23][pull request] Queue configs and large
buffer providers
On 8/18/25 14:57, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> Pull request with netdev only patches that add support for per queue
> configuration and large rx buffers for memory providers. The zcrx
> patch using it is separately and can be found at [2].
I'm sending it out as a v6.17-rc2 based pull request since I'll also
need it in another tree for zcrx. The patch number is over the limit,
however most of them are just taken from Jakub's series, and it'll
likely be esier this way for cross tree work. Please let me know if
that's acceptable or whether I need to somehow split or trim it
down.
--
Pavel Begunkov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists