lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9b55ae03-01b3-4a49-8eb7-b1f24e9e1ce0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 14:59:46 +0100
From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Willem de Bruijn
 <willemb@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 andrew+netdev@...n.ch, horms@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
 sdf@...ichev.me, almasrymina@...gle.com, dw@...idwei.uk,
 michael.chan@...adcom.com, dtatulea@...dia.com, ap420073@...il.com,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, io-uring@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 00/23][pull request] Queue configs and large
 buffer providers

On 8/18/25 14:57, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> Pull request with netdev only patches that add support for per queue
> configuration and large rx buffers for memory providers. The zcrx
> patch using it is separately and can be found at [2].

I'm sending it out as a v6.17-rc2 based pull request since I'll also
need it in another tree for zcrx. The patch number is over the limit,
however most of them are just taken from Jakub's series, and it'll
likely be esier this way for cross tree work. Please let me know if
that's acceptable or whether I need to somehow split or trim it
down.

-- 
Pavel Begunkov


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ