lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <68c3db9d-daf5-40ed-91a7-1d08b9c8cb52@broadcom.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 11:52:28 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@...e.de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 Broadcom internal kernel review list
 <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>, Andrew Lunn
 <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 Andrea della Porta <andrea.porta@...e.com>,
 Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
 Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>, Phil Elwell
 <phil@...pberrypi.com>, Jonathan Bell <jonathan@...pberrypi.com>,
 Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Add ethernet support for RPi5

On 8/18/25 11:50, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 11:02:15 -0700 Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> Few patches to enable support of ethernet on RPi5.
>>>
>>>    - first patch is setting upper 32bits of DMA RX ring buffer in case of
>>>      RX queue corruption.
>>>    - second patch is adding a new compatible in cdns,macb yaml document
>>>    - third patch adds compatible and configuration for raspberrypi,rp1-gem
>>>    - forth and fifth patches are adding and enabling ethernet DT node on
>>>      RPi5.
>>>
>>> Comments are welcome!
>>
>> netdev maintainers, do you mind if I take patches 2, 4 and 5 via the
>> Broadcom ARM SoC tree to avoid generating conflicts down the road? You
>> can take patches 1 and 3. Thanks
> 
> 4, 5 make perfect sense, why patch 2? We usually take bindings.

Because that way when CI runs against the ARM SoC tree, we don't get 
errors that the bindings are undocumented.
-- 
Florian

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ