[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADEbmW1ayx8dKUmE=ueYTVwBme=m1E9WGOmpcv1MCquZ1yBgHQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 08:30:38 +0200
From: Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@...hat.com>
To: Subbaraya Sundeep <sbhatta@...vell.com>
Cc: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>, Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] i40e: fix IRQ freeing in i40e_vsi_request_irq_msix
error path
On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 8:05 AM Subbaraya Sundeep <sbhatta@...vell.com> wrote:
> Hi Michal,
> On 2025-08-18 at 15:39:03, Michal Schmidt (mschmidt@...hat.com) wrote:
> > Use the same dev_id for free_irq() as for request_irq().
> >
> > I tested this with inserting code to fail intentionally.
> >
> Nice. Looks like changing this in i40e_vsi_request_irq_msix was missed
> during 493fb30011b3. Just a question isn't this not throwing any
> compilation warning all these days?
No warnings, because the type of the dev_id parameter is a void pointer.
Michal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists