[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aKYb7_xshbtFbXjb@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 09:03:11 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Matyas Hurtik <matyas.hurtik@...77.com>
Cc: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>,
Daniel Sedlak <daniel.sedlak@...77.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>,
Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@...ux.dev>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] memcg: expose socket memory pressure in a cgroup
Hello,
On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 06:51:07PM +0200, Matyas Hurtik wrote:
...
> And the read side:
> total_duration = 0;
> for (; !mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg); memcg = parent_mem_cgroup(memcg))
> total_duration += atomic_long_read(&memcg->socket_pressure_duration);
> Would that work?
This doesn't make sense to me. Why would a child report the numbers from its
ancestors?
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists