[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3e5e73f7-bbf5-490c-9cff-24f34d550d24@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 22:16:00 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Dong Yibo <dong100@...se.com>
Cc: andrew+netdev@...n.ch, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, horms@...nel.org,
corbet@....net, gur.stavi@...wei.com, maddy@...ux.ibm.com,
mpe@...erman.id.au, danishanwar@...com, lee@...ger.us,
gongfan1@...wei.com, lorenzo@...nel.org, geert+renesas@...der.be,
Parthiban.Veerasooran@...rochip.com, lukas.bulwahn@...hat.com,
alexanderduyck@...com, richardcochran@...il.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] net: rnpgbe: Add n500/n210 chip support
> +const struct rnpgbe_info rnpgbe_n500_info = {
> + .total_queue_pair_cnts = RNPGBE_MAX_QUEUES,
> + .hw_type = rnpgbe_hw_n500,
> + .init = &rnpgbe_init_n500,
> +};
> +
> +const struct rnpgbe_info rnpgbe_n210_info = {
> + .total_queue_pair_cnts = RNPGBE_MAX_QUEUES,
> + .hw_type = rnpgbe_hw_n210,
> + .init = &rnpgbe_init_n210,
> +};
> +
> +const struct rnpgbe_info rnpgbe_n210L_info = {
> + .total_queue_pair_cnts = RNPGBE_MAX_QUEUES,
> + .hw_type = rnpgbe_hw_n210L,
> + .init = &rnpgbe_init_n210,
> +};
total_queue_pair_cnts is the same for all three. So it probably does
not need to be in the structure. You can just use RNPGBE_MAX_QUEUES.
Andrew
---
pw-bot: cr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists