lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aKV0FF4FFARJNvZu@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 08:07:00 +0100
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
	Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
	Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
	Søren Andersen <san@...v.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 0/3] stmmac: stop silently dropping bad
 checksum packets

On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 11:02:14AM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> this series reworks how stmmac handles receive checksum offload
> (CoE) errors on dwmac4.
> 
> At present, when CoE is enabled, the hardware silently discards any
> frame that fails checksum validation. These packets never reach the
> driver and are not accounted in the generic drop statistics. They are
> only visible in the stmmac-specific counters as "payload error" or
> "header error" packets, which makes it harder to debug or monitor
> network issues.

FYI, there are counters at 0x214 and 0x228 that indicate header
problems, including checksum failures. There are also counters
at 0x234, 0x23c, 0x244 that count udp, tcp and icmp checksum
errors.

So, the hardware does keep statistics. Maybe we should make use
of those rather than the approach in this series?

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ