lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ff3b7df-cba0-4446-8411-7b99b5cdce69@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 11:42:32 +0200
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Yue Haibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
 dsahern@...nel.org, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, horms@...nel.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND net-next] ipv6: mcast: Add ip6_mc_find_idev()
 helper

On 8/18/25 12:10 PM, Yue Haibing wrote:
> @@ -302,32 +310,18 @@ int ipv6_sock_mc_drop(struct sock *sk, int ifindex, const struct in6_addr *addr)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(ipv6_sock_mc_drop);
>  
> -static struct inet6_dev *ip6_mc_find_dev(struct net *net,
> -					 const struct in6_addr *group,
> -					 int ifindex)
> +static struct inet6_dev *ip6_mc_find_idev(struct net *net,
> +					  const struct in6_addr *group,
> +					  int ifindex)
>  {
> -	struct net_device *dev = NULL;
> -	struct inet6_dev *idev;
> -
> -	if (ifindex == 0) {
> -		struct rt6_info *rt;
> +	struct inet6_dev *idev = NULL;
> +	struct net_device *dev;
>  
> -		rcu_read_lock();
> -		rt = rt6_lookup(net, group, NULL, 0, NULL, 0);
> -		if (rt) {
> -			dev = dst_dev(&rt->dst);
> -			dev_hold(dev);
> -			ip6_rt_put(rt);
> -		}
> -		rcu_read_unlock();
> -	} else {
> -		dev = dev_get_by_index(net, ifindex);
> +	dev = ip6_mc_find_dev(net, group, ifindex);
> +	if (dev) {
> +		idev = in6_dev_get(dev);
> +		dev_put(dev);
>  	}
> -	if (!dev)
> -		return NULL;
> -
> -	idev = in6_dev_get(dev);
> -	dev_put(dev);

Not so minor nit: if you omit the last chunk (from 'if (dev) {' onwards,
unneeded), the patch will be much more obvious and smaller. Also you
could clarify a bit the commit message.

You can retain Dawid's ack when posting the next version

/P


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ