netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 1/5] net: fec: use a member variable for maximum buffer size

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <12144026-130a-422a-8280-9e0b25b22562@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 20:55:58 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@....com>
Cc: Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
	Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@....com>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-imx@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 1/5] net: fec: use a member variable for
 maximum buffer size

On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 01:33:32PM -0500, Shenwei Wang wrote:
> Refactor code to support Jumbo frame functionality by adding a member
> variable in the fec_enet_private structure to store PKT_MAXBUF_SIZE.

This is better, thanks.

> @@ -1145,9 +1145,12 @@ static void
>  fec_restart(struct net_device *ndev)
>  {
>  	struct fec_enet_private *fep = netdev_priv(ndev);
> -	u32 rcntl = OPT_FRAME_SIZE | FEC_RCR_MII;
> +	u32 rcntl = FEC_RCR_MII;
>  	u32 ecntl = FEC_ECR_ETHEREN;
>  
> +	if (fep->max_buf_size == OPT_FRAME_SIZE)
> +		rcntl |= (fep->max_buf_size << 16);

I was expecting something like s/OPT_FRAME_SIZE/fep->max_buf_size/g

This is introducing extra logic. I think the if (...) belongs in
another patch. The assignment is however what i expected.

    Andrew

---
pw-bot: cr