[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aKh9_g7mgvFxMdAz@lore-rh-laptop>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2025 16:26:06 +0200
From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] net: airoha: Add airoha_ppe_dev struct
definition
On Aug 22, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Aug 2025 08:58:25 +0200 Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > > On Tue, 19 Aug 2025 14:21:07 +0200 Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > > > + pdev = of_find_device_by_node(np);
> > > > +
> > >
> > > did you mean to put the of_node_put() here?
> > >
> > > > + if (!pdev) {
> > > > + dev_err(dev, "cannot find device node %s\n", np->name);
> > > > + of_node_put(np);
> > > > + return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> > > > + }
> > > > + of_node_put(np);
> >
> > I moved the of_node_put() here (and in the if branch) in order to fix a similar
> > issue fixed by Alok for airoha_npu.
>
> Ah, didn't notice it in the print..
> maybe remove the empty line between the of_find_device.. and the null
> check on pdev then?
I am fine with it. I did it this way just to be consistent with NPU code:
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_npu.c#L403
Do you want me to post v3?
Regards,
Lorenzo
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists