[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id:
<175588440676.1915556.260278295179768223.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2025 17:40:06 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, horms@...nel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com, anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com,
przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com, jacob.e.keller@...el.com,
madhu.chittim@...el.com, pavan.kumar.linga@...el.com, joshua.a.hay@...el.com,
brianvv@...gle.com, willemb@...gle.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] idpf: do not linearize big TSO packets
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>:
On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 19:59:34 +0000 you wrote:
> idpf has a limit on number of scatter-gather frags
> that can be used per segment.
>
> Currently, idpf_tx_start() checks if the limit is hit
> and forces a linearization of the whole packet.
>
> This requires high order allocations that can fail
> under memory pressure. A full size BIG-TCP packet
> would require order-7 alocation on x86_64 :/
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net-next] idpf: do not linearize big TSO packets
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/02614eee26fb
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists