lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
 <PAXPR04MB9185A88FCCBA757077DD521D893CA@PAXPR04MB9185.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2025 19:34:16 +0000
From: Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@....com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
CC: Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David
 S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub
 Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Alexei
 Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Jesper
 Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
	Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@....com>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>,
	"imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org"
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 4/5] net: fec: add change_mtu to support
 dynamic buffer allocation



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
> Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2025 2:17 PM
> To: Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@....com>
> Cc: Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>; Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>;
> David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>; Eric Dumazet
> <edumazet@...gle.com>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>; Paolo Abeni
> <pabeni@...hat.com>; Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>; Daniel Borkmann
> <daniel@...earbox.net>; Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>; John
> Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>; Clark Wang
> <xiaoning.wang@....com>; Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>;
> imx@...ts.linux.dev; netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; dl-
> linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 4/5] net: fec: add change_mtu to support
> dynamic buffer allocation
> > +
> > +     WRITE_ONCE(ndev->mtu, new_mtu);
> > +
> > +     /* Create the pagepool according the new mtu */
> > +     if (fec_enet_alloc_buffers(ndev) < 0)
> > +             return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> 
> This is the wrong order. You need to first allocate the new buffers and then free
> the old ones. If the allocation fails, you still have a working interface using the
> smaller buffers, and the MTU change just returns -ENOMEM. If you free the
> buffers and the allocation of the new buffers fail, you interface is dead, because it
> has no buffers.
> 

I've considered that. I was wondering-if there's no available memory, should it still be 
treated as a critical issue for the system in this case?

The current API doesn't support allocating memory first and freeing it only upon success. 
Supporting such behavior would require a redesign of the buffer management flow.

As an alternative, we could attempt to fall back to allocating buffers of the original size if the 
operation fails. However, this still doesn't guarantee success.

Regards,
Shenwei

>         Andrew


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ