[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <daa73a77-3366-45b4-a770-fde87d4f50d8@linux.dev>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2025 10:57:30 -0700
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>, Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>, Kuniyuki Iwashima
<kuni1840@...il.com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 bpf-next/net 2/8] bpf: Add a bpf hook in
__inet_accept().
On 8/22/25 3:17 PM, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/af_inet.c b/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
> index ae83ecda3983..ab613abdfaa4 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
> @@ -763,6 +763,8 @@ void __inet_accept(struct socket *sock, struct socket *newsock, struct sock *new
> kmem_cache_charge(newsk, gfp);
> }
>
> + BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_INET_SOCK_ACCEPT(newsk);
> +
> if (mem_cgroup_sk_enabled(newsk)) {
> int amt;
>
> diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> index 233de8677382..80df246d4741 100644
> --- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -1133,6 +1133,7 @@ enum bpf_attach_type {
> BPF_NETKIT_PEER,
> BPF_TRACE_KPROBE_SESSION,
> BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_SESSION,
> + BPF_CGROUP_INET_SOCK_ACCEPT,
Instead of adding another hook, can the SK_BPF_MEMCG_SOCK_ISOLATED bit be
inherited from the listener?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists