netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] selftests: drv-net: xdp: make sure we're actually testing native XDP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: 
 <175614540627.3511457.5738695884587202392.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2025 18:10:06 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
 pabeni@...hat.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, horms@...nel.org, shuah@...nel.org,
 daniel@...earbox.net, hawk@...nel.org, john.fastabend@...il.com,
 sdf@...ichev.me, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] selftests: drv-net: xdp: make sure we're
 actually
 testing native XDP

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>:

On Fri, 22 Aug 2025 12:56:45 -0700 you wrote:
> Kernel tries to be helpful and attach the XDP program in generic
> mode if the driver has no BPF ndo at all. Since the xdp.py tests
> all have "native" in their names this can be quite confusing.
> Force native / "drv" attachment. Note that netdevsim re-uses
> the generic handler as its "native" handler, so we'll maintain
> the test coverage of the generic mode that way. No need to test
> both explicitly, I reckon.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net-next] selftests: drv-net: xdp: make sure we're actually testing native XDP
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/992e9f53a0db

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html