[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aKy9z1oephUbAr_E@mini-arch>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2025 12:47:27 -0700
From: Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@...il.com>
To: Samiullah Khawaja <skhawaja@...gle.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"David S . Miller " <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
almasrymina@...gle.com, willemb@...gle.com, mkarsten@...terloo.ca,
Joe Damato <joe@...a.to>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 1/2] Extend napi threaded polling to allow
kthread based busy polling
On 08/24, Samiullah Khawaja wrote:
> Add a new state to napi state enum:
>
> - NAPI_STATE_THREADED_BUSY_POLL
> Threaded busy poll is enabled/running for this napi.
>
> Following changes are introduced in the napi scheduling and state logic:
>
> - When threaded busy poll is enabled through sysfs or netlink it also
> enables NAPI_STATE_THREADED so a kthread is created per napi. It also
> sets NAPI_STATE_THREADED_BUSY_POLL bit on each napi to indicate that
> it is going to busy poll the napi.
>
> - When napi is scheduled with NAPI_STATE_SCHED_THREADED and associated
> kthread is woken up, the kthread owns the context. If
> NAPI_STATE_THREADED_BUSY_POLL and NAPI_STATE_SCHED_THREADED both are
> set then it means that kthread can busy poll.
>
> - To keep busy polling and to avoid scheduling of the interrupts, the
> napi_complete_done returns false when both NAPI_STATE_SCHED_THREADED
> and NAPI_STATE_THREADED_BUSY_POLL flags are set. Also
> napi_complete_done returns early to avoid the
> NAPI_STATE_SCHED_THREADED being unset.
>
> - If at any point NAPI_STATE_THREADED_BUSY_POLL is unset, the
> napi_complete_done will run and unset the NAPI_STATE_SCHED_THREADED
> bit also. This will make the associated kthread go to sleep as per
> existing logic.
>
> Signed-off-by: Samiullah Khawaja <skhawaja@...gle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
>
> ---
> Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-net | 3 +-
> Documentation/netlink/specs/netdev.yaml | 5 +-
> Documentation/networking/napi.rst | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> include/linux/netdevice.h | 11 +++-
> include/uapi/linux/netdev.h | 1 +
> net/core/dev.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++----
> net/core/dev.h | 3 ++
> net/core/net-sysfs.c | 2 +-
> net/core/netdev-genl-gen.c | 2 +-
> tools/include/uapi/linux/netdev.h | 1 +
> 10 files changed, 142 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-net b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-net
> index ebf21beba846..15d7d36a8294 100644
> --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-net
> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-net
> @@ -343,7 +343,7 @@ Date: Jan 2021
> KernelVersion: 5.12
> Contact: netdev@...r.kernel.org
> Description:
> - Boolean value to control the threaded mode per device. User could
> + Integer value to control the threaded mode per device. User could
> set this value to enable/disable threaded mode for all napi
> belonging to this device, without the need to do device up/down.
>
> @@ -351,4 +351,5 @@ Description:
> == ==================================
> 0 threaded mode disabled for this dev
> 1 threaded mode enabled for this dev
> + 2 threaded mode enabled, and busy polling enabled.
I might have asked already but forgot the answer: any reason we keep
extending sysfs? With a proper ynl control over per-queue settings,
why do we want an option to enable busy-polling threaded mode for the
whole device?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists