[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aLAS9SV_AhEeQIGM@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2025 09:27:33 +0100
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
Cc: andrew@...n.ch, hkallweit1@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
richardcochran@...il.com, Parthiban.Veerasooran@...rochip.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 2/2] net: phy: micrel: Add PTP support for
lan8842
Hi,
Just a few comments.
On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 09:34:25AM +0200, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c b/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c
> index 9a90818481320..95ba1a2859a9a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c
> @@ -457,6 +457,9 @@ struct lan8842_phy_stats {
>
> struct lan8842_priv {
> struct lan8842_phy_stats phy_stats;
> + int rev;
Maybe make this a u16 and move it at the end of the struct?
> + struct phy_device *phydev;
Why do you need this member? In this patch, you initialise this, but
never use it.
> @@ -5817,6 +5833,41 @@ static int lan8842_probe(struct phy_device *phydev)
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
>
> + /* Revision lan8832 doesn't have support for PTP, therefore don't add
> + * any PTP clocks
> + */
> + priv->rev = lanphy_read_page_reg(phydev, LAN8814_PAGE_COMMON_REGS,
> + LAN8842_SKU_REG);
> + if (priv->rev < 0)
> + return priv->rev;
ret = lanphy_read_page_reg(phydev, LAN8814_PAGE_COMMON_REGS,
LAN8842_SKU_REG);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
priv->rev = ret;
Thanks.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists