netdev - Re: [PATCH net] l2tp: do not use sock_hold() in pppol2tp_session_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: 
 <175634101099.886655.13279428145281475261.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2025 00:30:10 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, horms@...nel.org,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com, jchapman@...alix.com,
 gnault@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] l2tp: do not use sock_hold() in
 pppol2tp_session_get_sock()

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>:

On Tue, 26 Aug 2025 13:44:35 +0000 you wrote:
> pppol2tp_session_get_sock() is using RCU, it must be ready
> for sk_refcnt being zero.
> 
> Commit ee40fb2e1eb5 ("l2tp: protect sock pointer of
> struct pppol2tp_session with RCU") was correct because it
> had a call_rcu(..., pppol2tp_put_sk) which was later removed in blamed commit.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net] l2tp: do not use sock_hold() in pppol2tp_session_get_sock()
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/9b8c88f875c0

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html